I am trying to do a search that matches on the term of commit, then use the transaction statement to tie it back to everything that has the same OS_Process field but since every event does not contain the term commit, it does not show all the events. Is this possible? This is search "sourcetype=oracle_xml_* commit | transaction OS_Process | table Sql_Text | reverse"
I'm not sure how to get you 100% there, without playing with the data, but I'd try to avoid using Transaction, as it slows down the search considerably. I might try one of these options and see how close they get you:
[search sourcetype=oracle_xml_* commit | dedup OS_Process | fields OS_Process]
| table _time OS_Process Sql_Text
| sort OS_Process, _time
[search sourcetype=oracle_xml_* commit | dedup OS_Process | fields OS_Process]
| stats values(Sql_Text) by OS_Process
These will do a subsearch of the logs for anything containing "commit" and then pull out just the OS_Process. That way, you can do a search for just logs that actually have a commit in them, speeding up the search. You can then try to do a stats values(), or just a table with the texts. I think the latter is probably closest to what you want, but I'm not sure whether values() will sort the data oddly.
I'm not sure how to get you 100% there, without playing with the data, but I'd try to avoid using Transaction, as it slows down the search considerably. I might try one of these options and see how close they get you:
[search sourcetype=oracle_xml_* commit | dedup OS_Process | fields OS_Process]
| table _time OS_Process Sql_Text
| sort OS_Process, _time
[search sourcetype=oracle_xml_* commit | dedup OS_Process | fields OS_Process]
| stats values(Sql_Text) by OS_Process
These will do a subsearch of the logs for anything containing "commit" and then pull out just the OS_Process. That way, you can do a search for just logs that actually have a commit in them, speeding up the search. You can then try to do a stats values(), or just a table with the texts. I think the latter is probably closest to what you want, but I'm not sure whether values() will sort the data oddly.
Excellent! I'm glad to hear that solved it for you.
Thanks David, this worked great for me.