Splunk Search

Separate the array value in the different event.

parthiban
Path Finder

Hi team,

I mentioned that the payload field contains the entity-internal-id and lead-id in an array format. I want to print a separate event with one lead and one entity internal id present, and the rest of the values will be printed in the next event, respectively. Kindly suggest here.

correlation_id********
custom_attributes{ [-]
     campaign-id****
     campaign-name******
     country:
     entity-internal-id: [ [-]
       12345678
       87654321
     ]

     lead-id: [ [-]
       11112222
       33334444
     ]

     marketing-area*****
     record_count:
     root-entity-id2

}

Labels (3)
0 Karma
1 Solution

ITWhisperer
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust

Try something like this

| spath custom_attributes output=custom_attributes
| spath input=custom_attributes
| eval combined=mvzip('entity-internal-id{}','lead-id{}')
| mvexpand combined
| eval entity_internal_id = mvindex(split(combined,","),0)
| eval lead_id = mvindex(split(combined,","),1)

View solution in original post

ITWhisperer
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust

This looks like it might be JSON - if so, please provide your example (anonymised) event(s) in raw/unformatted form, i.e. valid JSON syntax, preferably in a code block </>

0 Karma

parthiban
Path Finder

 

Hi @ITWhisperer 
Here the raw format

{"message_type": "INFO", "processing_stage": "XXXXX", "message": "XXXXXX", "correlation_id": "XXXXXX", "error": "", "invoker_agent": "XXXXXX", "invoked_component": "XXXXXX, "request_payload": "", "response_details": "", "invocation_timestamp": "XXXXX", "response_timestamp": "XXXXX", "original_source_app": "XXXX", "AAAA": "", "retry_attempt": "1", "custom_attributes": {"entity-internal-id": ["12345678", "9876543", "2341234"], "root-entity-id": "3", "campaign-id": "XXXX", "campaign-name": "XXXXX", "marketing-area": "CCCC", "lead-id": ["000000", "1111111", "3333333"], "record_count": "", "country": ""}}

0 Karma

yuanliu
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust

If your JSON-compliant data contains two arrays that has to be mapped externally, your developers have committed the highest design crime.  If you have any influence over development team, beg them, implore them, curse them to change custom_attributes to something like

 

{"root-entity-id":"3","campaign-id":"XXXX","campaign-name":"XXXXX","marketing-area":"CCCC","record_count":"","country":"","id_array":[{"internal":"12345678","lead":"000000"},{"internal":"9876543","lead":"1111111"},{"internal":"2341234","lead":"3333333"}]}

 

This way, data processing (in any language, not just Splunk) will be much cleaner.  More importantly, downstream programmers such as yourself will not need to have this vertical knowledge about implied semantics.

No implied semantics is one of the most important advantages for people to adopt structured data formats such as JSON.  This means lower maintenance cost in the future.

0 Karma

ITWhisperer
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust

Try something like this

| spath custom_attributes output=custom_attributes
| spath input=custom_attributes
| eval combined=mvzip('entity-internal-id{}','lead-id{}')
| mvexpand combined
| eval entity_internal_id = mvindex(split(combined,","),0)
| eval lead_id = mvindex(split(combined,","),1)

parthiban
Path Finder

Thank you for your support @ITWhisperer , the given code is working as expected.

0 Karma
Got questions? Get answers!

Join the Splunk Community Slack to learn, troubleshoot, and make connections with fellow Splunk practitioners in real time!

Meet up IRL or virtually!

Join Splunk User Groups to connect and learn in-person by region or remotely by topic or industry.

Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

[Puzzles] Solve, Learn, Repeat: Character substitutions with Regular Expressions

This challenge was first posted on Slack #puzzles channelFor BORE at .conf23, we had a puzzle question which ...

Splunk Community Badges!

  Hey everyone! Ready to earn some serious bragging rights in the community? Along with our existing badges ...

[Puzzles] Solve, Learn, Repeat: Matching cron expressions

This puzzle (first published here) is based on matching timestamps to cron expressions.All the timestamps ...