Splunk Search

Search for IP Addresses more efficient using wildcards or CIDR ranges

andylee53
New Member

Hello

 

I'm looking to run a search in a Firewall log index for connections to a know IP range and trying to decide which is the more efficient way of doing it. As can be seen I'm excluding certain ports we expect to see traffic on I seem to remember that using "!=" is also considered inefficient as well open to other suggestions for using something else.

Current search looks like this

index="pan_logs" sourcetype="pan:traffic" dest_ip="91.226.*.*" | lookup dnslookup clientip AS src_ip OUTPUT clienthost AS remotehost | search dest_port!=48600 dest_port!=22 | table _time dest_ip dest_port remotehost

Labels (1)
0 Karma

to4kawa
Ultra Champion
index="pan_logs" sourcetype="pan:traffic" dest_ip="91.226.0.0/16" | lookup dnslookup clientip AS src_ip OUTPUT clienthost AS remotehost | table _time dest_ip dest_port remotehost | where dest_port!=48600 OR dest_port!=22
0 Karma

gcusello
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust

Hi @andylee53 ,

in general the use of != isn't a best practice in searches!

In my experience the CIDR is more efficient than wildcards.

Ciao.

Giuseppe

0 Karma

andylee53
New Member

@gcusello Many Thanks for the reply. I understood about the use of != but cannot think of a better alternative right now

 

Thanks for confirming the CIDR is more efficient I will give it a try

 

Regards

 

Andy

0 Karma
Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Celebrating Fast Lane: 2025 Authorized Learning Partner of the Year

At .conf25, Splunk proudly recognized Fast Lane as the 2025 Authorized Learning Partner of the Year. This ...

Tech Talk Recap | Mastering Threat Hunting

Mastering Threat HuntingDive into the world of threat hunting, exploring the key differences between ...

Observability for AI Applications: Troubleshooting Latency

If you’re working with proprietary company data, you’re probably going to have a locally hosted LLM or many ...