Splunk Search

Remove timestamps using regex

oliverpeloton23
Engager

Hi Splunk Community,

It's been a while since I've last used Splunk and regex, and now I'm struggling with both 🙂

Fields that I need to use ("resourceId") contain two user IDs and timestamps (e.g., "owner-10785-user-3801-key-1637099215"). I'm looking to keep the IDs and remove timestamps (basically everything after "owner-19803-user-8925-").

I came up with this clumsy thing:

index=main | eval resourceId1=replace (resourceId, "user-(?<user_id>\d+)", "") | eval resourceId2=replace (resourceId1, "owner-(?<owner_id>\d+)", "") | table resourceId2

It kind of works, the only problem is that it gives me the opposite result - it removes all the IDs leaving the timestamps, like this:

resourceId2
--key-1637100297
--1637100120.0929909
--key-1637100118

But I need the opposite. Can anyone please help?

Labels (1)
0 Karma
1 Solution

ITWhisperer
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust
| rex field=resourceId "owner-(?<owner>\d+)-user-(?<user>\d+)"
| eval resourceId2="owner-".owner."-user-".user

View solution in original post

ITWhisperer
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust
| rex field=resourceId "owner-(?<owner>\d+)-user-(?<user>\d+)"
| eval resourceId2="owner-".owner."-user-".user

oliverpeloton23
Engager

Thank you!

0 Karma
Got questions? Get answers!

Join the Splunk Community Slack to learn, troubleshoot, and make connections with fellow Splunk practitioners in real time!

Meet up IRL or virtually!

Join Splunk User Groups to connect and learn in-person by region or remotely by topic or industry.

Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Automated Threat Analysis: Available in ES Premier

Automated Threat Analysis: Centralize and Accelerate Phishing Investigations in Splunk Enterprise ...

What’s New in Splunk AI: Volume 02

Welcome to the second edition of “What’s New in Splunk AI” where we look at the latest and greatest updates, ...

Best Practices: Splunk auto adjust pipeline queue

When you enable autoAdjustQueue in Splunk, maxSize should be understood as the queue size Splunk starts with ...