Splunk Search

Regex - Capture group without duplicating value

ben_leung
Builder

This is my string

<search>1</search> <search>4</search> <search>2</search> <search>5</search> <search>3</search> <search>6</search>

I have the following rex command rex field=a_field "<search>(?<TESTING>(.?))</search>"
This will only grab TESTING=1. I want to grab all the values.

Using the rex command rex field=a_field "<search>(?<TESTING>.*)</search>"
will grab everything in-between, including the brackets and search string.

How would I make sure that I only grab the values between the bracketed strings?

Tags (2)
0 Karma

twinspop
Influencer

max_match:

| rex field=foo max_match=99 ....

Unless I'm misunderstanding the question

martin_mueller
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust

Additionally, take a look at non-greedy matching in regex. This will greedily match everything until the last closing tag:

<search>(?<TESTING>.*)</search>

While this will non-greedily match only the bit until the first closing tag:

<search>(?<TESTING>.*?)</search>

Note the question mark after the asterisk.

0 Karma

ben_leung
Builder

Perfect! Thank you for this parameter for the rex command.

0 Karma
Got questions? Get answers!

Join the Splunk Community Slack to learn, troubleshoot, and make connections with fellow Splunk practitioners in real time!

Meet up IRL or virtually!

Join Splunk User Groups to connect and learn in-person by region or remotely by topic or industry.

Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Announcing Modern Navigation: A New Era of Splunk User Experience

We are excited to introduce the Modern Navigation feature in the Splunk Platform, available to both cloud and ...

Modernize your Splunk Apps – Introducing Python 3.13 in Splunk

We are excited to announce that the upcoming releases of Splunk Enterprise 10.2.x and Splunk Cloud Platform ...

Step into “Hunt the Insider: An Splunk ES Premier Mystery” to catch a cybercriminal ...

After a whole week of being on call, you fell asleep on your keyboard, and you hit a sequence of buttons that ...