Splunk Search

Performant way to use "dedup" with group by

duesser
Path Finder

I basically have the opposite question as can be seen here:

https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/How-to-use-the-head-command-with-group-by/m-p/444439

I am looking for an increase in performance while keeping the search generic. As a minimal example I created this:

 

 

| makeresults 
| eval data=split("1;1,1;2,2;1,2;2",",")
| mvexpand data
| eval data=split(data,";")
| eval a=mvindex(data,0), b=mvindex(data,1)
| table a b
| dedup a

 

 

I know that I can tremendously speed up the search if I use a template like so, using "| head 1" on each group of a:

 

 

| makeresults 
| append 
    [| makeresults 
    | eval data=split("1;1,1;2,2;1,2;2",",") 
    | mvexpand data 
    | eval data=split(data,";") 
    | eval a=mvindex(data,0), b=mvindex(data,1) 
    | table a b 
    | search a=1 
    | head 1
        ] 
| append 
    [| makeresults 
    | eval data=split("1;1,1;2,2;1,2;2",",") 
    | mvexpand data 
    | eval data=split(data,";") 
    | eval a=mvindex(data,0), b=mvindex(data,1) 
    | table a b 
    | search a=2 
    | head 1
        ] 
| search a=* 
| table a b

 

 

However, this way the search is no longer generic and I have to know what groups "a" can take (1,2 in this example)

Question: Is there a way to increase performance on dedup while also keeping the search generic?

Labels (1)
0 Karma

ITWhisperer
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust

Do you mean something like this?

| stats first(*) as * by a

duesser
Path Finder

Yes - this works the same! BUT it yields the exact performance as "| dedup" for my real data example while the  "| head 1" approach is roughly 15x faster.

0 Karma

ITWhisperer
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust

I am not too surprised by that, head can discard events quicker than stats. You could try removing the table command from the appended searches and just have it at the end to see if that speeds things up.

0 Karma

duesser
Path Finder

It is like this my main search. I figured it would be - however, I thought there might be a trick to dynamically leverage the distinct values of "a" and then vectorize the head command or so. Thank you anyhow!

0 Karma
Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Your Guide to Splunk Digital Experience Monitoring

A flawless digital experience isn't just an advantage, it's key to customer loyalty and business success. But ...

Data Management Digest – November 2025

  Welcome to the inaugural edition of Data Management Digest! As your trusted partner in data innovation, the ...

Upcoming Webinar: Unmasking Insider Threats with Slunk Enterprise Security’s UEBA

Join us on Wed, Dec 10. at 10AM PST / 1PM EST for a live webinar and demo with Splunk experts! Discover how ...