Splunk Search

Performant way to use "dedup" with group by

duesser
Path Finder

I basically have the opposite question as can be seen here:

https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/How-to-use-the-head-command-with-group-by/m-p/444439

I am looking for an increase in performance while keeping the search generic. As a minimal example I created this:

 

 

| makeresults 
| eval data=split("1;1,1;2,2;1,2;2",",")
| mvexpand data
| eval data=split(data,";")
| eval a=mvindex(data,0), b=mvindex(data,1)
| table a b
| dedup a

 

 

I know that I can tremendously speed up the search if I use a template like so, using "| head 1" on each group of a:

 

 

| makeresults 
| append 
    [| makeresults 
    | eval data=split("1;1,1;2,2;1,2;2",",") 
    | mvexpand data 
    | eval data=split(data,";") 
    | eval a=mvindex(data,0), b=mvindex(data,1) 
    | table a b 
    | search a=1 
    | head 1
        ] 
| append 
    [| makeresults 
    | eval data=split("1;1,1;2,2;1,2;2",",") 
    | mvexpand data 
    | eval data=split(data,";") 
    | eval a=mvindex(data,0), b=mvindex(data,1) 
    | table a b 
    | search a=2 
    | head 1
        ] 
| search a=* 
| table a b

 

 

However, this way the search is no longer generic and I have to know what groups "a" can take (1,2 in this example)

Question: Is there a way to increase performance on dedup while also keeping the search generic?

Labels (1)
0 Karma

ITWhisperer
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust

Do you mean something like this?

| stats first(*) as * by a

duesser
Path Finder

Yes - this works the same! BUT it yields the exact performance as "| dedup" for my real data example while the  "| head 1" approach is roughly 15x faster.

0 Karma

ITWhisperer
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust

I am not too surprised by that, head can discard events quicker than stats. You could try removing the table command from the appended searches and just have it at the end to see if that speeds things up.

0 Karma

duesser
Path Finder

It is like this my main search. I figured it would be - however, I thought there might be a trick to dynamically leverage the distinct values of "a" and then vectorize the head command or so. Thank you anyhow!

0 Karma
Career Survey
First 500 qualified respondents will receive a $20 gift card! Tell us about your professional Splunk journey.
Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Thanks for the Memories! Splunk University, .conf25, and our Community

Thank you to everyone in the Splunk Community who joined us for .conf25, which kicked off with our iconic ...

Data Persistence in the OpenTelemetry Collector

This blog post is part of an ongoing series on OpenTelemetry. What happens if the OpenTelemetry collector ...

Introducing Splunk 10.0: Smarter, Faster, and More Powerful Than Ever

Now On Demand Whether you're managing complex deployments or looking to future-proof your data ...