Splunk Search

Multivalued field mapping issue from an nested XML source

sundarrajan
Path Finder

Hello Splunkers!

I have an issue in grouping multivalued field after extracting fields from nested xml. The sample is as follows,

 

 <WorkstationMetrics xmlns=“xxxxxxxx”>
                    <WorkstationMetricData TypeCode="None" WorkstationID="0">
                      <SequenceNumberValue Timestamp="2022-05-1" TypeCode="First">15704</SequenceNumberValue>
                      <SequenceNumberValue Timestamp="2022-05-1" TypeCode="Last">15710</SequenceNumberValue>
                    </WorkstationMetricData>
                    <WorkstationMetricData TypeCode="Manual" WorkstationID="03">
                      <SequenceNumberValue Timestamp="2022-05-1" TypeCode="First">9395</SequenceNumberValue>
                      <SequenceNumberValue Timestamp="2022-05-1" TypeCode="Last">9463</SequenceNumberValue>
                    </WorkstationMetricData>
                    <WorkstationMetricData TypeCode="Manual" WorkstationID="05">
                      <SequenceNumberValue Timestamp="2022-05-1" TypeCode="First">62</SequenceNumberValue>
                      <SequenceNumberValue Timestamp="2022-05-1" TypeCode="Last">297</SequenceNumberValue>
                    </WorkstationMetricData>
                  </WorkstationMetrics>

 

I tried with following search query to  extract field. But the fields extracted are multivalued with varying cardinality and hence some of my mvzip commands are not working as expected. Please find below my search query for your reference.

 

index=... sourcetype=...
| spath output=workstationNumber path=WorkstationMetrics.WorkstationMetricData{@WorkstationID}
| spath output=sequenceType path=WorkstationMetrics.WorkstationMetricData.SequenceNumberValue{@TypeCode}
| spath output=sequenceNumber path=WorkstationMetrics.WorkstationMetricData.SequenceNumberValue
| eval consolidate=mvzip(sequenceType,sequenceNumber)
| mvexpand consolidate
| eval temp=split(consolidate,","), type=mvindex(temp,0), seqno=mvindex(temp,1)
| table workstationNumber type seqno

 

I expect to present this data in following format, could some one 

Sl.noWorkstationIDTypeCodeSequenceNumberValue
10First15704
20Last15710

Any help in mapping 2 multivalued fields with varying cardinality would resolve this issue. Or do we need think out of box?

Labels (3)
0 Karma
1 Solution

ITWhisperer
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust
| spath output=workstationNumber path=WorkstationMetrics.WorkstationMetricData{@WorkstationID}
| spath output=workstationData path=WorkstationMetrics.WorkstationMetricData
| fields - _raw
| eval workstation=mvzip(workstationNumber, workstationData,"|")
| mvexpand workstation
| eval workstationNumber=mvindex(split(workstation,"|"),0)
| eval workstationData=mvindex(split(workstation,"|"),1)
| spath output=sequenceType input=workstationData path=SequenceNumberValue{@TypeCode}
| spath output=sequenceNumber input=workstationData path=SequenceNumberValue
| eval typevalue=mvzip(sequenceType, sequenceNumber,"|")
| mvexpand typevalue
| eval sequenceType=mvindex(split(typevalue,"|"),0)
| eval sequenceNumber=mvindex(split(typevalue,"|"),1)
| fields - workstation workstationData typevalue

View solution in original post

ITWhisperer
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust
| spath output=workstationNumber path=WorkstationMetrics.WorkstationMetricData{@WorkstationID}
| spath output=workstationData path=WorkstationMetrics.WorkstationMetricData
| fields - _raw
| eval workstation=mvzip(workstationNumber, workstationData,"|")
| mvexpand workstation
| eval workstationNumber=mvindex(split(workstation,"|"),0)
| eval workstationData=mvindex(split(workstation,"|"),1)
| spath output=sequenceType input=workstationData path=SequenceNumberValue{@TypeCode}
| spath output=sequenceNumber input=workstationData path=SequenceNumberValue
| eval typevalue=mvzip(sequenceType, sequenceNumber,"|")
| mvexpand typevalue
| eval sequenceType=mvindex(split(typevalue,"|"),0)
| eval sequenceNumber=mvindex(split(typevalue,"|"),1)
| fields - workstation workstationData typevalue

sundarrajan
Path Finder

Thanks @ITWhisperer ! It even works over a large dataset with multiple lines. A clear out-of box view, of taking the portion of event as a field and piping to rex  the relevant field. 

Thanks again!

0 Karma
Got questions? Get answers!

Join the Splunk Community Slack to learn, troubleshoot, and make connections with fellow Splunk practitioners in real time!

Meet up IRL or virtually!

Join Splunk User Groups to connect and learn in-person by region or remotely by topic or industry.

Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Index This | What travels the world but is also stuck in place?

April 2026 Edition  Hayyy Splunk Education Enthusiasts and the Eternally Curious!   We’re back with this ...

Discover New Use Cases: Unlock Greater Value from Your Existing Splunk Data

Realizing the full potential of your Splunk investment requires more than just understanding current usage; it ...

Continue Your Journey: Join Session 2 of the Data Management and Federation Bootcamp ...

As data volumes continue to grow and environments become more distributed, managing and optimizing data ...