Splunk Search

Is there a way to get 2 nonstream Searches to run in parallel in the same SPL?

robertlynch2020
Influencer

Hi - Is there a way to get 2 nonstream Searches to run in parallel in the same SPL?

I am using "appendcols", but I think one is waiting for the other to finish.

I can't use multisearch as I don't have stream commands.
The issue is displaying the license used by Splunk and I want to run 2 SPL in parallel. However, it's very slow to run if I run 2 in sequence. Thanks in advance for any help

 

index=_internal 
    [ `set_local_host`] source=*license_usage.log* type="Usage" 
| eval h=if(len(h)=0 OR isnull(h),"(SQUASHED)",h) 
| eval s=if(len(s)=0 OR isnull(s),"(SQUASHED)",s) 
| eval idx=if(len(idx)=0 OR isnull(idx),"(UNKNOWN)",idx) 
| bin _time span=1d 
| stats sum(b) as b by _time, pool, s, st, h, idx 
| search pool = "*" 
| search idx != "mlc_log_drop" 
| timechart span=1d sum(b) AS Live_Data fixedrange=false 
| fields - _timediff 
| foreach * 
    [ eval <<FIELD>>=round('<<FIELD>>'/1024/1024/1024, 3)] 
| appendcols 
    [ search index=_internal 
        [ `set_local_host`] source=*license_usage.log* type="Usage" 
    | eval h=if(len(h)=0 OR isnull(h),"(SQUASHED)",h) 
    | eval s=if(len(s)=0 OR isnull(s),"(SQUASHED)",s) 
    | eval idx=if(len(idx)=0 OR isnull(idx),"(UNKNOWN)",idx) 
    | bin _time span=1d 
    | stats sum(b) as b by _time, pool, s, st, h, idx 
    | search pool = "*" 
    | search idx = "mlc_log_drop" 
    | timechart span=1d sum(b) AS Log_Drop_Data fixedrange=false 
    | fields - _timediff 
    | foreach * 
        [ eval <<FIELD>>=round('<<FIELD>>'/1024/1024/1024, 3)]] 

 

 

 

0 Karma
1 Solution

PickleRick
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust

You're asking a wrong question.

Your both searches start with the same base search so either you should be able to do all in one go or your searches produce differently aggregated results so it doesn't make sense to combine them with appendcols.

View solution in original post

PickleRick
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust

You're asking a wrong question.

Your both searches start with the same base search so either you should be able to do all in one go or your searches produce differently aggregated results so it doesn't make sense to combine them with appendcols.

robertlynch2020
Influencer

HI

I agree that is correct and this was an example of 2 SPLs I had, but I had other issues else where the SPLs were different.

The UNION command was able to help me out in this case.

Thanks

Robert

0 Karma
Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Splunk Observability as Code: From Zero to Dashboard

For the details on what Self-Service Observability and Observability as Code is, we have some awesome content ...

[Puzzles] Solve, Learn, Repeat: Character substitutions with Regular Expressions

This challenge was first posted on Slack #puzzles channelFor BORE at .conf23, we had a puzzle question which ...

Shape the Future of Splunk: Join the Product Research Lab!

Join the Splunk Product Research Lab and connect with us in the Slack channel #product-research-lab to get ...