Splunk Search

How to write a search to find if a field contains a valid IPv4 or IPv6 address?

hcastell
Path Finder

Hi all, as a splunk newbie I'm not sure what direction to go with the following. Basically I have two Interesting fields, one contains an IPv4 address and the other contains an IPv6 address. Sometime though these fields contain 0.0.0.0 for IPv4 and :: for IPv6. What I need is a search string that allows me to test these two fields to make sure they have valid addresses. I know how to test for 0.0.0.0 or :: but want to test that a valid address exists. Later I will have to verify that the address is correct based on values in other interesting fields (example: user is in building 1, IP address must be x.x.x.y etc..). I see lots of examples of how to extract addresses but in my case I don't need to extract anything as the value exists in an interesting field. Hope my question is clear. Appreciate any guidance offered.

Tags (3)
0 Karma
1 Solution

martin_mueller
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust

You can verify IPv4 addresses like this (assuming field name is ipv4😞

... | eval ipv4_valid = if(match(ipv4, "^((25[0-5]|2[0-4][0-9]|[01]?[0-9][0-9]?)\.){3}(25[0-5]|2[0-4][0-9]|[01]?[0-9][0-9]?)$"), "valid", "invalid")

And IPv6 like this:

... | eval ipv6_valid = if(match(ipv6, "^(([0-9a-fA-F]{1,4}:){7,7}[0-9a-fA-F]{1,4}|([0-9a-fA-F]{1,4}:){1,7}:|([0-9a-fA-F]{1,4}:){1,6}:[0-9a-fA-F]{1,4}|([0-9a-fA-F]{1,4}:){1,5}(:[0-9a-fA-F]{1,4}){1,2}|([0-9a-fA-F]{1,4}:){1,4}(:[0-9a-fA-F]{1,4}){1,3}|([0-9a-fA-F]{1,4}:){1,3}(:[0-9a-fA-F]{1,4}){1,4}|([0-9a-fA-F]{1,4}:){1,2}(:[0-9a-fA-F]{1,4}){1,5}|[0-9a-fA-F]{1,4}:((:[0-9a-fA-F]{1,4}){1,6})|:((:[0-9a-fA-F]{1,4}){1,7}|:)|fe80:(:[0-9a-fA-F]{0,4}){0,4}%[0-9a-zA-Z]{1,}|::(ffff(:0{1,4}){0,1}:){0,1}((25[0-5]|(2[0-4]|1{0,1}[0-9]){0,1}[0-9]).){3,3}(25[0-5]|(2[0-4]|1{0,1}[0-9]){0,1}[0-9])|([0-9a-fA-F]{1,4}:){1,4}:((25[0-5]|(2[0-4]|1{0,1}[0-9]){0,1}[0-9]).){3,3}(25[0-5]|(2[0-4]|1{0,1}[0-9]){0,1}[0-9]))$"), "valid", "invalid")

The IPv6 regex has been shamelessly stolen from http://stackoverflow.com/a/17871737 🙂

It'd probably be a good idea to plonk these things into a macro.

View solution in original post

tfujita_splunk
Splunk Employee
Splunk Employee

I created a Splunk Macros for regular expressions for IPv4 and IPv6 addresses.

Definitions and usages are in an article below.
https://qiita.com/Joh256/private/659ef65897905890ef99

I also put them in an add-on below.
https://splunkbase.splunk.com/app/6595

 

0 Karma

martin_mueller
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust

You can verify IPv4 addresses like this (assuming field name is ipv4😞

... | eval ipv4_valid = if(match(ipv4, "^((25[0-5]|2[0-4][0-9]|[01]?[0-9][0-9]?)\.){3}(25[0-5]|2[0-4][0-9]|[01]?[0-9][0-9]?)$"), "valid", "invalid")

And IPv6 like this:

... | eval ipv6_valid = if(match(ipv6, "^(([0-9a-fA-F]{1,4}:){7,7}[0-9a-fA-F]{1,4}|([0-9a-fA-F]{1,4}:){1,7}:|([0-9a-fA-F]{1,4}:){1,6}:[0-9a-fA-F]{1,4}|([0-9a-fA-F]{1,4}:){1,5}(:[0-9a-fA-F]{1,4}){1,2}|([0-9a-fA-F]{1,4}:){1,4}(:[0-9a-fA-F]{1,4}){1,3}|([0-9a-fA-F]{1,4}:){1,3}(:[0-9a-fA-F]{1,4}){1,4}|([0-9a-fA-F]{1,4}:){1,2}(:[0-9a-fA-F]{1,4}){1,5}|[0-9a-fA-F]{1,4}:((:[0-9a-fA-F]{1,4}){1,6})|:((:[0-9a-fA-F]{1,4}){1,7}|:)|fe80:(:[0-9a-fA-F]{0,4}){0,4}%[0-9a-zA-Z]{1,}|::(ffff(:0{1,4}){0,1}:){0,1}((25[0-5]|(2[0-4]|1{0,1}[0-9]){0,1}[0-9]).){3,3}(25[0-5]|(2[0-4]|1{0,1}[0-9]){0,1}[0-9])|([0-9a-fA-F]{1,4}:){1,4}:((25[0-5]|(2[0-4]|1{0,1}[0-9]){0,1}[0-9]).){3,3}(25[0-5]|(2[0-4]|1{0,1}[0-9]){0,1}[0-9]))$"), "valid", "invalid")

The IPv6 regex has been shamelessly stolen from http://stackoverflow.com/a/17871737 🙂

It'd probably be a good idea to plonk these things into a macro.

hcastell
Path Finder

Thanks. Had not done a Macro before before so this is very helpful.

0 Karma

martin_mueller
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust

Doesn't take a lot of research - Go to Settings -> Advanced Search -> Macros -> New -> Give it a name and paste the content -> set permissions to "global" and "Everyone" -> use in a search like this:

... | eval ipv6_valid = if(match(ipv6, `your_ipv6_regex_macro`)) | ...

hcastell
Path Finder

Thanks Martin. This helps a lot. Will research creating a macro for these as you suggest.

0 Karma
Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Introducing the Splunk Developer Program!

Hey Splunk community!  We are excited to announce that Splunk is launching the Splunk Developer Program in ...

Splunkbase Year in Review 2024

Reflecting on 2024, it’s clear that innovation and collaboration have defined the journey for Splunk ...

Developer Spotlight with Brett Adams

In our third Spotlight feature, we're excited to shine a light on Brett—a Splunk consultant, innovative ...