Splunk Search

How to run an "if" argument in a search?

NizanCohen
Explorer

Hi.

I'm trying to get only failed login attempts but while I could find the correct field, it's not as accurate as there might be a successful login after the session.

The only way I can think off to bypass this is to use "if" argument but I don't know how to involve "if" in SPL.

Here's the fields I currently use:

index=application sourcetype=globalscape cs_method="*user*" sc_status=530 - provides all failed logins.

index=application sourcetype=globalscape cs_method="*pass*" sc_status=230 - provides all successful logins.

 

Thank you for assisting!

Labels (2)
0 Karma

richgalloway
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust

This is a common use case.  To find failures not followed by a success we look for both then take the most recent event for each user.  Finally, discard the successes and you're left with users with failed logins.

index=application sourcetype=globalscape ((cs_method="*user*" sc_status=530) OR (cs_method="*pass*" sc_status=230))
| dedup username ```or some other unique per-user field```
```Discard successful logins```
| where (cs_method="*user*" AND sc_status=530)
---
If this reply helps you, Karma would be appreciated.
0 Karma

NizanCohen
Explorer

What if the user failed to login, waited a day, tried again and got success. 

Would it show it with your suggested query?

0 Karma

richgalloway
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust

That would depend on your search window, but, yes, it's possible.

---
If this reply helps you, Karma would be appreciated.
0 Karma
Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Splunk Decoded: Service Maps vs Service Analyzer Tree View vs Flow Maps

It’s Monday morning, and your phone is buzzing with alert escalations – your customer-facing portal is running ...

What’s New in Splunk Observability – September 2025

What's NewWe are excited to announce the latest enhancements to Splunk Observability, designed to help ITOps ...

Fun with Regular Expression - multiples of nine

Fun with Regular Expression - multiples of nineThis challenge was first posted on Slack #regex channel ...