I have data like this:
21,enrollmentgroup,19936,40:G6:7Q:G6:89:FG,,nitro - Circle.one10,Phone,11.1.11313,C,10/25/18 4:58,Enroll,enroll@ms.com,Movies & TV,microsoft,Public,YES,,2019.11111.10112.0,0,0,0,Installed,App installed by user,10/24/18 14:50,10/25/18 4:00
21,enrollmentgroup,19935,20:11:32:11:61:71,,nitro - Circle.one10,Phone,10.0.14393,C,10/25/18 4:58,Enroll,enroll@ms.com,PC Manager,c10f24324242432-43242,Internal,YES,11.5.1.11119,18.10.3.1009,0,0,0,Pending Install,Installed,10/24/18 14:49,10/24/18 22:09
443,S-0001,11222,01:11:7F:E1:D1:71,,nitro - loop.one12,Phone,10.0.14393,C,9/3/18 12:23,Enroll,enroll@ms.com, Mapping Better,631d-2e321-4312-b511f-83f2,Internal,YES,10.0.0.623,20.0.0.5921,0,0,0,Pending Install,Unkown,8/31/18 9:33,10/2/18 0:20
I wrote this but it appears to be too much for Splunk
rex field=_raw "(?<ig1>.+?)([,])(?<loc>.+?)([,])(?<ig2>.+?)([,])(?<MacAddress>.+?)([,])(?<modelType>.+?)([,])(?<ig3>.+?)([,])(?<OS>.+?)([,])(?<ig4>.+?)([,])(?<lastSeen>.+?)([,])(?<user>.+?)([,])(?<useremail>.+?)([,])(?<Application>.+?)([,])(?<ig5>.+?)([,])(?<deployed>.+?)([,])(?<public>.+?)([,])(?<assignedVersion>.+?)([,])(?<installedVersion>.+?)([,])(?<ig6>.+?)([,])(?<ig7>.+?)([,])(?<ig8>.+?)([,])(?<status>.+?)([,])(?<installedby>.+?)([,])(?<appFirstSeen>.+?)([,])(?<appUpdatedTime>.+?)([,]|$)"
Any suggestions? I cannot edit profs etc. I must do this via regex within the query.
Thanks,
| rex field=_raw "^(?<f1>[^,]+)?,(?<loc>[^,]+)?,(?<f3>[^,]+)?,(?<MacAddress>[^,]+)?,(?<modelType>[^,]+)?,(?<OS>[^,]+)?,(?<f7>[^,]+)?,(?<f8>[^,]+)?,(?<f9>[^,]+)?,(?<lastSeen>[^,]+)?,(?<user>[^,]+)?,(?<useremail>[^,]+)?,(?<Application>[^,]+)?,(?<f14>[^,]+)?,(?<deployed>[^,]+)?,(?<public>[^,]+)?,(?<assignedVersion>[^,]+)?,(?<installedVersion>[^,]+)?,(?<f19>[^,]+)?,(?<f20>[^,]+)?,(?<f21>[^,]+)?,(?<status>[^,]+)?,(?<installedby>[^,]+)?,(?<appFirstSeen>[^,]+)?,(?<appUpdatedTime>[^,]+)?"
This time with everything included...
| rex field=_raw "^(?<f1>[^,]+)?,(?<loc>[^,]+)?,(?<f3>[^,]+)?,(?<MacAddress>[^,]+)?,(?<modelType>[^,]+)?,(?<OS>[^,]+)?,(?<f7>[^,]+)?,(?<f8>[^,]+)?,(?<f9>[^,]+)?,(?<lastSeen>[^,]+)?,(?<user>[^,]+)?,(?<useremail>[^,]+)?,(?<Application>[^,]+)?,(?<f14>[^,]+)?,(?<deployed>[^,]+)?,(?<public>[^,]+)?,(?<assignedVersion>[^,]+)?,(?<installedVersion>[^,]+)?,(?<f19>[^,]+)?,(?<f20>[^,]+)?,(?<f21>[^,]+)?,(?<status>[^,]+)?,(?<installedby>[^,]+)?,(?<appFirstSeen>[^,]+)?,(?<appUpdatedTime>[^,]+)?"
This time with everything included...
Awesome thank you!
It seems like a perfect csv format, except the missing header...
Try this: | rex field=_raw "^(?[^,]+)?,(?[^,]+)?,(?[^,]+)?,(?[^,]+)?,(?[^,]+)?,(?[^,]+)?,(?[^,]+)?,(?[^,]+)?,(?[^,]+)?,(?[^,]+)?,(?[^,]+)?,(?[^,]+)?,(?[^,]+)?,(?[^,]+)?,(?[^,]+)?,(?[^,]+)?,(?[^,]+)?,(?[^,]+)?,(?[^,]+)?,(?[^,]+)?,(?[^,]+)?,(?[^,]+)?,(?[^,]+)?,(?[^,]+)?,(?[^,]+)?"
I think this improved it slightly again, still getting the error though.
,(?<loc>.+?),.+?,(?<MacAddress>.+?),,(?<ModelType>.+?),.+?,(?<OS>.+?),.+?,(?<LastSeen>.+?),(?<user>.+?),(?<useremail>.+?),(?<Application>.+?),.+?,(?<deployed>.+?),(?<public>.+?),(?<assignedVersion>.+?),(?<installedVersion>.+?),.+?,.+?,.+?,(?<status>.+?),(?<installedby>.+?),(?<appFirstSeen>.+?),(?<appUpdatedTime>.+?)$
All those .+?
are very unnecessarily complex. It matches everything and the regex processor constantly needs to check if perhaps it should stop capturing and continue reading the comma and proceed with the next capturing group.
As @jimmoriarty has already mentioned in his answer: replace the .+?
by [^,]+
(so matching all characters except comma), which makes it much, much more efficient.
Made some changes to try and lower the greediness of my search
^(.+?),(?<loc>.+?),(.+?),(?<MacAddress>.+?),,(?<ModelType>.+?),(.+?),(?<OS>.+?),(.+?),(?<LastSeen>.+?),(?<user>.+?),(?<useremail>.+?),(?<Application>.+?),(.+?),(?<deployed>.+?),(?<public>.+?),(?<assignedVersion>.+?),(?<installedVersion>.+?),(.+?),(.+?),(.+?),(?<status>.+?),(?<installedby>.+?),(?<appFirstSeen>.+?),(?<appUpdatedTime>.+?)$
Still getting the error: has exceeded configured match_limit