Splunk Search

How to create a eval-based macro

hobbes3
Explorer

I am trying to approximate the distance between two points. Each point has a latitude, longitude, and elevation. Unfortunately Splunk can't do sines and cosines out of the box, so I had to use a Taylor polynomial in my function:

| eval lat0=$lat0$*pi()/180
| eval lat1=$lat1$*pi()/180
| eval lon0=$lon0$*pi()/180
| eval lon1=$lon1$*pi()/180
| eval coslat0=1-pow(lat0,2)/(2*1)+pow(lat0,4)/(4*3*2*1)-pow(lat0,6)/(6*5*4*3*2*1)
| eval coslon0=1-pow(lon0,2)/(2*1)+pow(lon0,4)/(4*3*2*1)-pow(lon0,6)/(6*5*4*3*2*1)
| eval sinlat0=lat0-pow(lat0,3)/(3*2*1)+pow(lat0,5)/(5*4*3*2*1)-pow(lat0,7)/(7*6*5*4*3*2*1)
| eval sinlon0=lon0-pow(lon0,3)/(3*2*1)+pow(lon0,5)/(5*4*3*2*1)-pow(lon0,7)/(7*6*5*4*3*2*1)
| eval coslat1=1-pow(lat1,2)/(2*1)+pow(lat1,4)/(4*3*2*1)-pow(lat1,6)/(6*5*4*3*2*1)
| eval coslon1=1-pow(lon1,2)/(2*1)+pow(lon1,4)/(4*3*2*1)-pow(lon1,6)/(6*5*4*3*2*1)
| eval sinlat1=lat1-pow(lat1,3)/(3*2*1)+pow(lat1,5)/(5*4*3*2*1)-pow(lat1,7)/(7*6*5*4*3*2*1)
| eval sinlon1=lon1-pow(lon1,3)/(3*2*1)+pow(lon1,5)/(5*4*3*2*1)-pow(lon1,7)/(7*6*5*4*3*2*1)
| eval x0=$ele0$*coslat0*sinlon0
| eval x1=$ele1$*coslat1*sinlon1
| eval y0=$ele0$*sinlat0
| eval y1=$ele1$*sinlat1
| eval z0=$ele0$*coslat0*coslon0+6370
| eval z1=$ele1$*coslat1*coslon1+6370
| eval distance=sqrt(pow(x1-x0,2)+pow(y1-y0,2)+pow(z1-z0,2))

I would call this macro distance(6) with the 6 variables: lat0, lon0, ele0, lat1, lon1, ele1.

How do I create/use this macro so I can use it in a search like this:

index="gpx" source="/home/hobbes3/strava/a_nice_ride.gpx" | ... | eval distance=`distance(lat0, lon0, ele0, lat1, lon1, ele1)`
Tags (2)
0 Karma
1 Solution

sowings
Splunk Employee
Splunk Employee

Strictly speaking, that's not an eval-based macro. You should simply be able to take the body of your eval statements and paste them into the macro definition. The name of the macro would be distance(6) indicating six args, and you'll want to line up your $lat0$, etc arguments with the args specifier of the macro.

Finally, you'll call it as | `distance(...)`, with the output field name of "distance" being implicit.

View solution in original post

sowings
Splunk Employee
Splunk Employee

Strictly speaking, that's not an eval-based macro. You should simply be able to take the body of your eval statements and paste them into the macro definition. The name of the macro would be distance(6) indicating six args, and you'll want to line up your $lat0$, etc arguments with the args specifier of the macro.

Finally, you'll call it as | `distance(...)`, with the output field name of "distance" being implicit.

Got questions? Get answers!

Join the Splunk Community Slack to learn, troubleshoot, and make connections with fellow Splunk practitioners in real time!

Meet up IRL or virtually!

Join Splunk User Groups to connect and learn in-person by region or remotely by topic or industry.

Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Automating Threat Operations and Threat Hunting with Recorded Future

    Automating Threat Operations and Threat Hunting with Recorded Future June 29, 2026 | Register   Is your ...

Keep the Learning Going with the New Best of .conf Hub

Hello Splunkers, With .conf26 getting closer, there’s already a lot of excitement building around this year’s ...

Splunk Community Badges!

  Hey everyone! Ready to earn some serious bragging rights in the community? Along with our existing badges ...