hi
I have total 7 components installed. 3 have failed to install and 4 are successfully installed... I want to take a pie chart like how much time was taken for each components whether it's installed successfully or failed. i want to show both in a pie chart or any other charts. I have my sample data below. Please provide some ideas to solve this.
I tried with this search:
source="status log1.txt" |chart avg(_time) over result by components
am getting x-axis as mill-nano-sec and y-axis as components results... and am not getting a pie chart
2015-02-21 03:17:10 , pid=12,technology=JAVA, result="successfully installed"
2015-02-21 03:35:10 , pid=13,technology=Coherence, result="successfully installed"
2015-02-21 03:56:10 , pid=14,technology=Nosql, result="failed to installed"
2015-02-21 04:09:10 , pid=15,technology=splunk, result="successfully installed"
2015-02-21 04:13:10 , pid=16,technology=weblogic,result="successfully installed"
2015-02-21 04:24:10 , pid=17,technology=OEP, result="failed to installed"
2015-02-21 04:29:10 , pid=18,technology=kazzing, result="successfully installed"
You can change the appearance with the symbols at the top left of the chart, below "Events", "Patterns", "Statistics" and "Visualization". The one on the left selects the type of your chart and the one on the right gives you formatting options, so you should be able to change your chart to a pie chart with the left button.
I don't think your search as it is is a good basis for a pie chart though - a pie chart is useful to compare the relation of values to each other (e.g. to see the composition of your results by category), but time as continuous data is not something I'd recommend a pie chart for (except that you could "bucket" your time, but that is something else). If my guess what you are lookin for is correct, what you want to do is a search like this (assuming your fields are "technology" and "result" like you posted in your log):
source="status log1.txt" | chart count(technology) by result
This gives you the number (and resulting percentage) of successful and failed installs for the timeframe you set your search to. If this is generally in the direction of what you want, you should think about how to deal with multiple installs of the same technology (which are not distinguished with this basic search right now), and whether the drilldown to see what failed and what succeeded is sophisticated enough for you as it is.
You can change the appearance with the symbols at the top left of the chart, below "Events", "Patterns", "Statistics" and "Visualization". The one on the left selects the type of your chart and the one on the right gives you formatting options, so you should be able to change your chart to a pie chart with the left button.
I don't think your search as it is is a good basis for a pie chart though - a pie chart is useful to compare the relation of values to each other (e.g. to see the composition of your results by category), but time as continuous data is not something I'd recommend a pie chart for (except that you could "bucket" your time, but that is something else). If my guess what you are lookin for is correct, what you want to do is a search like this (assuming your fields are "technology" and "result" like you posted in your log):
source="status log1.txt" | chart count(technology) by result
This gives you the number (and resulting percentage) of successful and failed installs for the timeframe you set your search to. If this is generally in the direction of what you want, you should think about how to deal with multiple installs of the same technology (which are not distinguished with this basic search right now), and whether the drilldown to see what failed and what succeeded is sophisticated enough for you as it is.
Thank u for u r response ... i want to show in graph which technology is successfully installed and which one failed to install with any chart
Thank u
The search I posted should be good to go with a pie chart. When you click on the pieces of that pie chart, it shows you which components were successful (and which weren't).