Splunk Search

How do you get Splunk to change timestamps from a lookup table?

UMDTERPS
Communicator

We are using a lookuptable with CSV's for reports. However, the _time field has the following format for time:

2015-06-10T20:04:51.254843Z

How do I get Splunk to interpret that for _time?

Is there a way to edit the _time field to get rid of everything from the "T" on and show 2015-06-10 and use strptime?

Thanks!

0 Karma
1 Solution

chrisyounger
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust

This time can be parsed by strptime without any changes. For example

|makeresults | eval time = "2015-06-10T20:04:51.254843Z" | eval parsedTime = strptime(time, "%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S.%6QZ")

View solution in original post

chrisyounger
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust

This time can be parsed by strptime without any changes. For example

|makeresults | eval time = "2015-06-10T20:04:51.254843Z" | eval parsedTime = strptime(time, "%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S.%6QZ")

UMDTERPS
Communicator

It works somewhat, but the eval of 2015-06-10T20:04:51.254843Z converts the time to:

2019-02-07 10:09:54

The time should be June 10, 2015.

I'm trying to get Spunk to interpret the format of our time field " 2015-06-10T20:04:51.254843Z" to make a time graph.

?

0 Karma

Vijeta
Influencer

you need to assign _time to the lookup time value.

For ex.

eval _time=strptime(lookuptime,"%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S.%6QZ")

UMDTERPS
Communicator

| inputlookup REPORT.csv | eval time=strptime(lastLogonTimestamp,"%m/%d/%y")

The above seemed to work.

Thanks everyone!

0 Karma
Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Extending Observability Content to Splunk Cloud

Watch Now!   In this Extending Observability Content to Splunk Cloud Tech Talk, you'll see how to leverage ...

More Control Over Your Monitoring Costs with Archived Metrics!

What if there was a way you could keep all the metrics data you need while saving on storage costs?This is now ...

New in Observability Cloud - Explicit Bucket Histograms

Splunk introduces native support for histograms as a metric data type within Observability Cloud with Explicit ...