Splunk Search

Change table representation

anisgupt
New Member

I have a table as follows:

CN|Lev|ref1|ref2|ref3|ref4|ref5|ref6
cn1|1|1|2|3|4|||
cn2|2|||||5|6|

The representation required is:

CN|Lev|Ref|Count
cn1|1|ref1|1
cn1|1|ref2|2
cn1|1|ref3|3
cn1|1|ref4|4
cn2|2|ref5|5
cn2|2|ref6|6

Tags (1)
0 Karma

ashajambagi
Communicator

Hi @anisgupt ,

Please try below query and let me know if it helps:

| makeresults 
| eval CN="cn1", Lev="1", ref1="1", ref2="2", ref3="3", ref4="4", ref5="", ref6="" 
| append 
    [| makeresults 
    | eval CN="cn2", Lev="2", ref1="", ref2="", ref3="", ref4="", ref5="5", ref6="6" ] 
| eval cr=mvzip(CN,Lev,"-") 
| fields - _time Lev CN 
| untable cr Ref Count 
| rex field=cr "(?P<CN>[^\,].+)-(?P<Lev>.+)" 
| table CN Lev Ref Count| where Count>0

ashajambagi
Communicator

@anisgupt Can you please accept the answer if it helped with your issue!

0 Karma
Got questions? Get answers!

Join the Splunk Community Slack to learn, troubleshoot, and make connections with fellow Splunk practitioners in real time!

Meet up IRL or virtually!

Join Splunk User Groups to connect and learn in-person by region or remotely by topic or industry.

Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

At .conf26, Don’t Just See What’s Next. Help Shape It at Innovation Labs.

Long before a new capability reaches the keynote stage, it begins as an idea waiting to be tested. At ...

Forwarder Topology Guidance: Intermediate HF vs Intermediate UF

If you are designing a Splunk forwarding architecture, it can be tempting to place a Universal Forwarder (UF) ...

Data Management Digest – August 2026

Data Management Digest   Welcome to the August 2026 edition of Data Management Digest! August was a big month ...