Splunk Search

Append command not working to combine two searches with the same result but events occurred in two different timespans

kanj
New Member

Hello there,

Step1:
user software_name dc_today dc_past
A XYZ.exe 1 9
B PQR.exe 2 3
C DTA.exe 0 1

The final result should be:
user software_name dc_today
A XYZ.exe 1

My method:
index=* _index_earliest=-1d |stats dc(user) as dc by software_name |eval dc_today=if(dc=1, 1, 0)
|append [search index=* _index_earliest=-5d |stats dc(user) as dc by software_name |eval dc_past=if(dc=1,1,0)]
|table user software_name dc_today dc_past

So I am running two similar searches with differences in timespan.
1) Append is not reflecting the sub-search
2) Is there more efficient way for this?

Thanks in advance!
KanJ

0 Karma

to4kawa
Ultra Champion
 index=* earliest=-1d 
| stats dc(user) as dc by software_name 
| eval dc_today=if(dc=1, 1, 0) 
| append 
    [ search index=* earliest=-5d 
    | stats dc(user) as dc by software_name 
    | eval dc_past=if(dc=1,1,0)] 
| table user software_name dc_today dc_past

The user of your query is disappear. because stats aggregates.

index=* earliest=-5d 
| stats dc(eval(if(related_time(now(),"-1d") <= _time,user,NULL))) as dc_today dc(user) as dc_past by software_name 

Unique user count in software name is above.

The final result should be:
user software_name dc_today
A XYZ.exe 1

What's your logic?

0 Karma
Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

App Platform's 2025 Year in Review: A Year of Innovation, Growth, and Community

As we step into 2026, it’s the perfect moment to reflect on what an extraordinary year 2025 was for the Splunk ...

Operationalizing Entity Risk Score with Enterprise Security 8.3+

Overview Enterprise Security 8.3 introduces a powerful new feature called “Entity Risk Scoring” (ERS) for ...

Unlock Database Monitoring with Splunk Observability Cloud

  In today’s fast-paced digital landscape, even minor database slowdowns can disrupt user experiences and ...