Splunk Search

Alternative/Compliment to stats first()

duesser
Path Finder

 

| makeresults
| eval _raw="id;x;y;z;k
a;1;;;
a;;1;;
a;;;1;
a;2;;;
a;;2;;
a;;;;1
b;1;;;
b;;1;;
b;;;1;
b;2;;;
b;;2;;
b;;;;1
a;;1;;
a;;;1;
a;2;;;
a;;2;;
a;;;;1
b;1;;;
b;;1;;
b;;;1;
b;2;;;
b;;2;;
b;;;;1"
| multikv forceheader=1
| fields id x y z k
| table id x y z k
| stats first(*) AS * BY id

 

I have date of the following form, where the usual variables Z and K (might) have multiple measurements that are not unique, so I use "| stats first()" to aggregate them to the ID. However there are variables X and Y that do contain multiple unique values (which might also repeat). In the end I would like to obtain a table like so:

 

id	x1	x2	y1	y2	z	k
a	1	2	1	2	1	1
b	1	2	1	2	1	1

 

Where (ideally) the fields of X and Y are numbered for each unique value (NOT the value in the field) so that if 3 unique values are in the data it would yield X1,2,3.

Labels (3)
0 Karma
1 Solution

ITWhisperer
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust
| table id x y z k
| stats list(x) as x list(y) as y first(z) AS z first(k) as k BY id
| eval x=mvdedup(x)
| eval y=mvdedup(y)
| eval xrange=mvrange(0,mvcount(x))
| mvexpand xrange
| eval name="x".(xrange+1)
| eval {name}=mvindex(x,xrange)
| eval yrange=mvrange(0,mvcount(y))
| mvexpand yrange
| eval name="y".(yrange+1)
| eval {name}=mvindex(y,yrange)
| fields - x xrange y yrange name
| stats values(*) as * by id

View solution in original post

ITWhisperer
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust
| table id x y z k
| stats list(x) as x list(y) as y first(z) AS z first(k) as k BY id
| eval x=mvdedup(x)
| eval y=mvdedup(y)
| eval xrange=mvrange(0,mvcount(x))
| mvexpand xrange
| eval name="x".(xrange+1)
| eval {name}=mvindex(x,xrange)
| eval yrange=mvrange(0,mvcount(y))
| mvexpand yrange
| eval name="y".(yrange+1)
| eval {name}=mvindex(y,yrange)
| fields - x xrange y yrange name
| stats values(*) as * by id

duesser
Path Finder

Great solution - I did not know about mvindex and mvrange! They seem like a usefull couple.

instead of list -> mvdedup you can just use values.

0 Karma

ITWhisperer
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust

I went for list and mvdedup to preserve the order, if the order is not significant, then yes, values is just as good.

Got questions? Get answers!

Join the Splunk Community Slack to learn, troubleshoot, and make connections with fellow Splunk practitioners in real time!

Meet up IRL or virtually!

Join Splunk User Groups to connect and learn in-person by region or remotely by topic or industry.

Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Announcing Modern Navigation: A New Era of Splunk User Experience

We are excited to introduce the Modern Navigation feature in the Splunk Platform, available to both cloud and ...

Observability Simplified: Combining User Experience, Application Performance & ...

Tech Talk Observability Simplified: Combining User Experience, Application Performance & Network ...

Event Series May & June: From Network Visibility to Service Intelligence

Unifying the Network: Moving from Alert Noise to Service Intelligence with Splunk ITSI In today’s hybrid ...