Splunk SOAR

Is there a way to catch errors coming from custom function block?

GeorgeOrwell
Explorer

Currently when I want to catch errors coming from arbitrary action block I rely on phantom.get_summary() looking at action status. But I notice that Custom Function blocks cannot be found there, so my question is how do I check the status of a Custom Function block, and catch errors originating there

Labels (2)
0 Karma
1 Solution

phanTom
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust

There are two ways to handle any issues/errors from custom functions:

1. Move the CF code into apps so that they can be part of the summary at the end. (I have just done this for one of my customers but for efficiency rather than this issue).

2. Handle any possible issues in the function code and have an output of "status" and/or "message" and handle it in the playbook. This still won't appear in the summary but will let you know if any CFs had an issue. 

 

Happy SOARing!

View solution in original post

phanTom
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust

There are two ways to handle any issues/errors from custom functions:

1. Move the CF code into apps so that they can be part of the summary at the end. (I have just done this for one of my customers but for efficiency rather than this issue).

2. Handle any possible issues in the function code and have an output of "status" and/or "message" and handle it in the playbook. This still won't appear in the summary but will let you know if any CFs had an issue. 

 

Happy SOARing!

Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Enterprise Security Content Update (ESCU) | New Releases

In December, the Splunk Threat Research Team had 1 release of new security content via the Enterprise Security ...

Why am I not seeing the finding in Splunk Enterprise Security Analyst Queue?

(This is the first of a series of 2 blogs). Splunk Enterprise Security is a fantastic tool that offers robust ...

Index This | What are the 12 Days of Splunk-mas?

December 2024 Edition Hayyy Splunk Education Enthusiasts and the Eternally Curious!  We’re back with another ...