Hi.
I use a lot the metrics.log Indexer side, to debug some bottleneck and/or stress inside the Infrastructure.
There is a field, i can't really understand at all,
INFO Metrics - group=tcpin_connections
x.x.x.x:50496:9997
connectionType=cookedSSL
sourcePort=50496
sourceHost=x.x.x.x
sourceIp=x.x.x.x
destPort=9997
kb=15.458984375
_tcp_avg_thruput=7.262044477222557
_tcp_Kprocessed=589.84765625
[...]
It's the "tcp_Kprocessed" field,
especially related to the field "kb", which is the most important, in my opinion.
What is in practice "tcp_Kprocessed", considering that its values are often very inconsistent and not proportionate to the kb?
Thanks.
Yep!
Le't stay as said... if someone else wants to add something, you're welcome,
tcp_Kprocessed == Kb received by the receiver as a packet of events
kb == the real Kb (compressed) written on Indexer storage
Explicit and simple,
tcp_Kprocessed == the Networking thruput of events packet
kb == the Compressed Data written to Indexer Storage of previous packet
👍
yes, sounds logic 😉
You can add idea to document these fields at https://ideas.splunk.com/ideas/new
Yep!
Le't stay as said... if someone else wants to add something, you're welcome,
tcp_Kprocessed == Kb received by the receiver as a packet of events
kb == the real Kb (compressed) written on Indexer storage
Explicit and simple,
tcp_Kprocessed == the Networking thruput of events packet
kb == the Compressed Data written to Indexer Storage of previous packet
👍
Hello @verbal_666 I think this is the volume indexed.
I'm counting the "kb" as volume of data received and ingected into Indexers.
Is this wrong, so?
So, what's the relation beetwen "kb" and "tcp_Kprocessed" ?
I'm still in doubt 🤔🤔🤔
Seems tcp_kprocessed is total transferred data and kb the volume indexed for that particular event.
You may submit support ticket for further information as this doesn't look documented.
Maybe could be
tcp_Kprocessed == Kb received by the receiver as a packet of events
kb == the real Kb (compressed) written on Indexer storage
So, for my purposes, i keep on using the sum of "kb" as volume of data from UF to Indexers.
Yes, it's not documented at all 🙄🙄🙄🤷♂️
Thanks!