Splunk Enterprise

Help on eval strange behaviour

jip31
Motivator

hello

I have a strange behavior with an eval command

if I am doing this it works well

 

 

| eval site=case(site=="0", "AA", site=="BR", "BB", site=="PER", "CC", 1==1,site) 
| eval s=lower(s)  
|search site="$site$"

 

 

 but if I put | search site="$site$" just after the eval, the search command is not recognized as a splunk command!

 

 

| eval site=case(site=="0", "AA", site=="BR", "BB", site=="PER", "CC", 1==1,site)   
|search site="$site$"

 

 

 what is wrong please?

Tags (1)
0 Karma
1 Solution

jip31
Motivator

I found the solution by parsing each pipe section on a separate line.

View solution in original post

Tags (1)
0 Karma

kamlesh_vaghela
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust

@jip31 

It would be better if you can share your sample XML. It will help us to understand the token and the filtration.

Meanwhile, you can try the below XML I've tried to replicate the issue with fix.

<form version="1.1">
  <label>Site Filter</label>
  <fieldset submitButton="false">
    <input type="text" token="site">
      <label>Site</label>
    </input>
  </fieldset>
  <row>
    <panel>
      <table>
        <search>
          <query>| makeresults 
| eval site="0|BR|PER|KAMLESH", site=split(site,"|") 
| mvexpand site 
| eval site=case(site=="0", "AA", site=="BR", "BB", site=="PER", "CC", 1==1,site)
| eval siteFilter="$site$"
| search (siteFilter="" OR site="$site$") | table site
</query>
          <earliest>-24h@h</earliest>
          <latest>now</latest>
          <sampleRatio>1</sampleRatio>
        </search>
        <option name="count">50</option>
        <option name="dataOverlayMode">none</option>
        <option name="drilldown">none</option>
        <option name="percentagesRow">false</option>
        <option name="refresh.display">progressbar</option>
        <option name="rowNumbers">false</option>
        <option name="totalsRow">false</option>
        <option name="wrap">true</option>
      </table>
    </panel>
  </row>
</form>

 

I hope this will help you.

 

Thanks
KV
If any of my replies help you to solve the problem Or gain knowledge, an upvote would be appreciated.

0 Karma

jip31
Motivator

I found the solution by parsing each pipe section on a separate line.

Tags (1)
0 Karma
Got questions? Get answers!

Join the Splunk Community Slack to learn, troubleshoot, and make connections with fellow Splunk practitioners in real time!

Meet up IRL or virtually!

Join Splunk User Groups to connect and learn in-person by region or remotely by topic or industry.

Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Persistent Queue at TcpOut — One of Splunk's Most Practical Features

Splunk introduced persistent queueing at the tcpout layer as one of the most practical resilience features in ...

Skip the Awkward Silence: Have a .conf-ersation at .conf26

Picture this. You arrive at .conf26 already having your socializing and networking plans mapped out. No ...

Rethinking Zero Trust: From Product Purchases to Logical Control Evidence

Implementing Zero Trust (ZT) across complex environments often falters at the very beginning due to a ...