Splunk AppDynamics

Bug on Kubernetes Cluster Agent new version 23.6.0

Everton_Arakaki
Explorer

Before 23.6.0, the agent was respecting the parameter:

    instrumentationConfig:
        numberOfTaskWorkers: 2
 
After 23.6.0, this config is not been respected and many instrumentation happens leading to high cpu usage. I tried all parameters but it looks a bug to me, it was working before. I'm using this config. All my java services have readiness and liveness probes.
 
    clusterAgent:
        containerProperties:
            containerBatchSize: 1
            containerParallelRequestLimit: 1
            podBatchSize: 1
    instrumentationConfig:
        numberOfTaskWorkers: 1
        podBatchSize: 2
 
please help
Labels (1)
0 Karma

iamryan
Community Manager
Community Manager

Hi @Everton.Arakaki,

Did you ever reach out to Support and get a reply?

0 Karma

Virendra_Singh
New Member

@Ryan.Paredez Is there any update on this? I am also struggling with the same issue. Changing it to a higher number (e.g., 5) or a lower number (e.g., 1) doesn't work. It's taking a default value of 2.

0 Karma

iamryan
Community Manager
Community Manager

Hi @Everton.Arakaki,

Thanks for sharing this with the Community. For an issue that you believe is a bug, it's best to report it to Support as well. It's helpful to share in the community so others may know it's an issue.

Support will be able to get it reported to engineering in a different avenue.

How do I submit a Support ticket? An FAQ 

0 Karma
Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Shape the Future of Splunk: Join the Product Research Lab!

Join the Splunk Product Research Lab and connect with us in the Slack channel #product-research-lab to get ...

Auto-Injector for Everything Else: Making OpenTelemetry Truly Universal

You might have seen Splunk’s recent announcement about donating the OpenTelemetry Injector to the ...

[Puzzles] Solve, Learn, Repeat: Character substitutions with Regular Expressions

This challenge was first posted on Slack #puzzles channelFor BORE at .conf23, we had a puzzle question which ...