Security

SSDs RAID Level

jensterddcaa
New Member

Spunk "Inheriter" here - getting conflicting opinions from hardware SAN storage vendor vs. Splunk.
Since the beginning, I've gone by the rule "RAID 5 + Splunk = slow performance"
With today's enterprise class SSD drives and SAN-level tiering, the h/w vendor states that RAID 5 works fine.
I even found a Splunk Live! presentation that says performance won't suffer.
Would love to get some real-world feedback!

0 Karma

nickhills
Ultra Champion

I can't give credit, because I cant remember who said it on Slack, but....

Even if your vendors SAN can provide infinite IOPS, it probably wont.

Take everything a vendor (and your storage team) tell you with a pinch of salt.
The story you will be told is the one from the glossy marketing sheet, however when it comes to you getting your slice of the pie, you're just another 'customer' on the SAN, and your needs have to be balanced with the other workloads on the storage system too.

Many people have had great success with new fast shared storage, but there is certainly a bigger number who have not.
My preference is indexers with dedicated local ssd, for hot/warm.

Shared storage has its place, for me, that is cold!
:)

If my comment helps, please give it a thumbs up!
0 Karma
Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Splunk Education - Fast Start Program!

Welcome to Splunk Education! Splunk training programs are designed to enable you to get started quickly and ...

Five Subtly Different Ways of Adding Manual Instrumentation in Java

You can find the code of this example on GitHub here. Please feel free to star the repository to keep in ...

New Splunk APM Enhancements Help Troubleshoot Your MySQL and NoSQL Databases Faster

Splunk Observability has two new enhancements to make it quicker and easier to troubleshoot slow or frequently ...