Security

Query to loop through data in splunk

freephoneid
Path Finder

I've below lines in my log:

[email protected] id=1234 ....
[email protected] id=4565 ....
[email protected] id=5773 ....
  1. Capture all those ids for the period from -1d@d to @d
  2. For each id, search from beginning of index until -1d@d & see if the id is already present by comparing actual id field
  3. If it is not present, then add it into the counter
  4. Display this final count.

I just need the final count in one query.

Can I achieve this in Splunk?

Thanks!

Tags (2)
0 Karma
1 Solution

gkanapathy
Splunk Employee
Splunk Employee

It's much better to state your problem, rather than presume an algorithm for it. Would it be accurate to say that you want to know "how many people logged in for the first time yesterday"?

If that's the case, then I would ask you further: Are you running this query once? Or every day? Or how often, approximately? And I would ask, how many days are in your index before yesterday, approximately? Do you plan to keep this history around forever, or just a limited amount of time?

A simple, one shot answer is below. It is extremely inefficient if you are going to be running this query regularly, and/or if you have a large amount of history. But maybe your data set isn't that large in total, so it doesn't matter.

... latest=@d 
    | stats min(_time) as firsttime by id 
    | where (relative_time(now(),"-1d@d") <= firsttime) AND (firsttime < relative_time(now(),"@d"))
    | stats count

View solution in original post

0 Karma

gkanapathy
Splunk Employee
Splunk Employee

It's much better to state your problem, rather than presume an algorithm for it. Would it be accurate to say that you want to know "how many people logged in for the first time yesterday"?

If that's the case, then I would ask you further: Are you running this query once? Or every day? Or how often, approximately? And I would ask, how many days are in your index before yesterday, approximately? Do you plan to keep this history around forever, or just a limited amount of time?

A simple, one shot answer is below. It is extremely inefficient if you are going to be running this query regularly, and/or if you have a large amount of history. But maybe your data set isn't that large in total, so it doesn't matter.

... latest=@d 
    | stats min(_time) as firsttime by id 
    | where (relative_time(now(),"-1d@d") <= firsttime) AND (firsttime < relative_time(now(),"@d"))
    | stats count
0 Karma
Got questions? Get answers!

Join the Splunk Community Slack to learn, troubleshoot, and make connections with fellow Splunk practitioners in real time!

Meet up IRL or virtually!

Join Splunk User Groups to connect and learn in-person by region or remotely by topic or industry.

Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Meet the .conf26 AI Agent Buildathon Winners

At the .conf26 AI Agent Buildathon, Splunk users turned their operational expertise into working AI agents ...

Trusted Autonomy in the SOC: A Maturity Journey

AI is compressing attacker timelines and pushing SOC teams beyond human capacity thresholds. The next SOC ...

Supercharging Windows Security Detection Performance: Introducing Hybrid Field ...

Windows event logs—from Security auditing and Sysmon to PowerShell script blocks—form the operational backbone ...