Security

Query to loop through data in splunk

freephoneid
Path Finder

I've below lines in my log:

[email protected] id=1234 ....
[email protected] id=4565 ....
[email protected] id=5773 ....
  1. Capture all those ids for the period from -1d@d to @d
  2. For each id, search from beginning of index until -1d@d & see if the id is already present by comparing actual id field
  3. If it is not present, then add it into the counter
  4. Display this final count.

I just need the final count in one query.

Can I achieve this in Splunk?

Thanks!

Tags (2)
0 Karma
1 Solution

gkanapathy
Splunk Employee
Splunk Employee

It's much better to state your problem, rather than presume an algorithm for it. Would it be accurate to say that you want to know "how many people logged in for the first time yesterday"?

If that's the case, then I would ask you further: Are you running this query once? Or every day? Or how often, approximately? And I would ask, how many days are in your index before yesterday, approximately? Do you plan to keep this history around forever, or just a limited amount of time?

A simple, one shot answer is below. It is extremely inefficient if you are going to be running this query regularly, and/or if you have a large amount of history. But maybe your data set isn't that large in total, so it doesn't matter.

... latest=@d 
    | stats min(_time) as firsttime by id 
    | where (relative_time(now(),"-1d@d") <= firsttime) AND (firsttime < relative_time(now(),"@d"))
    | stats count

View solution in original post

0 Karma

gkanapathy
Splunk Employee
Splunk Employee

It's much better to state your problem, rather than presume an algorithm for it. Would it be accurate to say that you want to know "how many people logged in for the first time yesterday"?

If that's the case, then I would ask you further: Are you running this query once? Or every day? Or how often, approximately? And I would ask, how many days are in your index before yesterday, approximately? Do you plan to keep this history around forever, or just a limited amount of time?

A simple, one shot answer is below. It is extremely inefficient if you are going to be running this query regularly, and/or if you have a large amount of history. But maybe your data set isn't that large in total, so it doesn't matter.

... latest=@d 
    | stats min(_time) as firsttime by id 
    | where (relative_time(now(),"-1d@d") <= firsttime) AND (firsttime < relative_time(now(),"@d"))
    | stats count
0 Karma
Got questions? Get answers!

Join the Splunk Community Slack to learn, troubleshoot, and make connections with fellow Splunk practitioners in real time!

Meet up IRL or virtually!

Join Splunk User Groups to connect and learn in-person by region or remotely by topic or industry.

Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Announcing Modern Navigation: A New Era of Splunk User Experience

We are excited to introduce the Modern Navigation feature in the Splunk Platform, available to both cloud and ...

Detection Engineering Office Hours: Real-World Troubleshooting & Q&A

[REGISTER HERE] This thread is for the Community Office Hours session on Detection Engineering Office Hours: ...

Developer Spotlight with Mika Borner

From Hackathon Winner to Enterprise Leader    Mika Borner, CEO and Founder of Datapunctum AG, has been ...