Security

How to investigate high-risk communication to internet using Correlation Search

m_tanaka
Explorer

In my environment, palo alto (proxy) logs are being stored into Splunk.

I want to know what kind of operation on a server make high-risk communication to internet using palo alto logs and Windows event logs or Linux audit  log or some thing.

Is it possible with Correlation Search of Splunk ?

Labels (1)

m_tanaka
Explorer

Thank you for your reply.

I extracted data from palo alto using Splunk Add-on for Palo Alto Networks. Here is an example.

Oct 28 13:46:12 192.168.248.2 1 2024-10-28T13:46:12+09:00 PA-VM - - - - 1,2024/10/28 13:46:09,007254000360102,TRAFFIC,start,2818,2024/10/28 13:46:09,192.168.252.100,13.107.5.93,192.168.252.2,13.107.5.93,dmz-to-internet,,,web-browsing,vsys1,DMZ,INTERNET,ethernet1/2,ethernet1/1,SecurityCheck,2024/10/28 13:46:12,497655,1,54084,443,35405,443,0x1400000,tcp,allow,5636,1220,4416,11,2024/10/28 13:46:10,0,computer-and-internet-info,,7423264892787200760,0x0,192.168.0.0-192.168.255.255,United States,,6,5,n/a,0,0,0,0,,PA-VM,from-policy,,,0,,0,,N/A,0,0,0,0,c2a50b1f-ea25-41ce-9c7c-709bde6deec4,0,0,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,2024-10-28T13:46:12.041+09:00,,,internet-utility,general-internet,browser-based,4,"used-by-malware,able-to-transfer-file,has-known-vulnerability,tunnel-other-application,pervasive-use",,web-browsing,no,no,0,NonProxyTraffic,,0,0,0

About the second comment, The risk value is shown in the log. In the above example, the risk value is 4. (the value can be 1 ~ 5)  It is seems to be determined by Palo Alto (Palo Alto Add-on).

However I wonder the true high risk communication can be extracted from logs and what action is the cause of the risky communication (by correlation search). 

For now, I want to make correlation search from the palo alto log and Windows event log.

0 Karma

dural_yyz
Builder

https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/pan-os/11-1/pan-os-admin/monitoring/use-syslog-for-monitoring/sysl...

https://knowledgebase.paloaltonetworks.com/KCSArticleDetail?id=kA10g000000ClmQCAS

Risk Calculation

Weights

CharacteristicFactor

Evasive3

Excessive Bandwidth

Use

1
Used by Malware4
Capable of File Transfer3
Known Vulnerabilities3
Tunnels Other Apps2
Prone to Misuse2
Pervasive1
Total19

 

Risk Assignment

RiskRange

10–3
24–6
37–9
410–13
514+

 

Your example log actually shows which of the risk factors were part of the calculation.

 

internet-utility,general-internet,browser-based,4,"used-by-malware,able-to-transfer-file,has-known-vulnerability,tunnel-other-application,pervasive-use",,web-browsing

 

I believe you would be better served by correlating with DNS records sourced from the original machine, and/or investigating how to have Palo Alto resolve the URL inside the session log.  You might actually have that already in the "threat" log entries.

 

0 Karma

prateek
Engager

Amazing

0 Karma

ITWhisperer
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust

The first thing you need is an understanding of your data. It is your data. We do not have access to it and do not know what data you have, so it is difficult for us to determine what information you might be able to extract from it.

Secondly, risk is subjective. What do you deem to be high risk? What evidence do you have in your logs (that are now in Splunk) that might help you determine if something is "risky"?

Such open questions as you have posed, only lead to more questions.

Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Enterprise Security Content Update (ESCU) | New Releases

In December, the Splunk Threat Research Team had 1 release of new security content via the Enterprise Security ...

Why am I not seeing the finding in Splunk Enterprise Security Analyst Queue?

(This is the first of a series of 2 blogs). Splunk Enterprise Security is a fantastic tool that offers robust ...

Index This | What are the 12 Days of Splunk-mas?

December 2024 Edition Hayyy Splunk Education Enthusiasts and the Eternally Curious!  We’re back with another ...