Monitoring Splunk

When troubleshooting data ingestion on search heads, which SH is best to use ?

damode1
Path Finder

As the title says, when troubleshooting data ingestion on search heads e.g. running an SPL to check if certain data is landing to that index or searching through an addon like aws to check its diagnostic logs on the HF.

For tests like these, which search heads are best to use, monitoring console or a regular search head or an SHC ?

Tags (1)
0 Karma

gcusello
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust

Hi @damode1,

when you speak of troubleshooting data ingestion, probably you're meaning of serching on Splunk.

In this case you can use every Search Head that can access data, there isn't any prefereable one.

If instead you are using SHs for inputs, it isn't correct, it's always better to have different roles (usually Universal or Heavy Forwarders) to ingest data.

The only exception is Splunk Cloud, where in the Search Heads you can do almost everything.

Ciao.,

Giuseppe

0 Karma
Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

.conf25 Community Recap

Hello Splunkers, And just like that, .conf25 is in the books! What an incredible few days — full of learning, ...

Splunk App Developers | .conf25 Recap & What’s Next

If you stopped by the Builder Bar at .conf25 this year, thank you! The retro tech beer garden vibes were ...

Congratulations to the 2025-2026 SplunkTrust!

Hello, Splunk Community! We are beyond thrilled to announce our newest group of SplunkTrust members!  The ...