Monitoring Splunk

How important are the TCPOutAutoLB Health Warnings?

Glasses2
Communicator
Hi,
I have seen yellow and red health warnings for TCPOutAutoLB-0 for sometime. 
 
We identified a few issues like a HF that was sending loads of data and locking to 1 single Indexer for a long time.    But after some HF config changes (i.e. parallel pipelines and asynchronous fwding) the warning frequency has been reduced, but I still see these yellow warnings randomly. 
 
 
How worried should you be if you see yellow or red health warnings like this >
 
TCPOutAutoLB-0 with RootCause  "more than <20% or 50%> of forwarding destinations have failed.." 
 
These warnings eventually they clear.   
 
When I check indexer saturation a few will be a 100% but I cannot tell for how long.  The 100% saturation seems to be very short lived.
 
Do these alerts fire based on count alone or does it have a saturation time check as well, like the 100% saturation state needs to be sustained for more than 30 seconds?
 
Are these typical warnings to just live with or is it something you never want to see?  or when is it a problem?
 
Is there a setting to increase the indexer HW use to process the events faster and clear blocks?
 
Thank you 
0 Karma
Got questions? Get answers!

Join the Splunk Community Slack to learn, troubleshoot, and make connections with fellow Splunk practitioners in real time!

Meet up IRL or virtually!

Join Splunk User Groups to connect and learn in-person by region or remotely by topic or industry.

Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Splunk Community Badges!

  Hey everyone! Ready to earn some serious bragging rights in the community? Along with our existing badges ...

How to find the worst searches in your Splunk environment and how to fix them

Everyone knows Splunk is a powerful platform for running searches and doing data analytics. Your ...

Share Your Feedback: On Admin Config Service (ACS)!

Help Us Build a Better Admin Config Service Experience (ACS)   We Want Your Feedback on Admin Config Service ...