- Mark as New
- Bookmark Message
- Subscribe to Message
- Mute Message
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content

landen99
Motivator
10-13-2018
01:15 PM
When a kvstore lookup definition filters a kvstore of 1 million events down to 300k, does performance improve vs using the original kvstore collection unfiltered?
1 Solution
- Mark as New
- Bookmark Message
- Subscribe to Message
- Mute Message
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content

landen99
Motivator
10-13-2018
01:38 PM
http://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/latest/Admin/Transformsconf?splunkbot
filter = <string>
* Filter results from the lookup table before returning data. Create this filter like you would a typical search query using Boolean expressions and/or comparison operators.
* For KV Store lookups, filtering is done when data is initially retrieved to improve performance.
* For CSV lookups, filtering is done in memory.
It looks like performance is improved after the filter is applied on reading the kvstore.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark Message
- Subscribe to Message
- Mute Message
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content

landen99
Motivator
10-13-2018
01:38 PM
http://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/latest/Admin/Transformsconf?splunkbot
filter = <string>
* Filter results from the lookup table before returning data. Create this filter like you would a typical search query using Boolean expressions and/or comparison operators.
* For KV Store lookups, filtering is done when data is initially retrieved to improve performance.
* For CSV lookups, filtering is done in memory.
It looks like performance is improved after the filter is applied on reading the kvstore.
