Getting Data In

Why are the logs being forwarder from one source to the Splunk indexer in a Splunk forwader deployed on a Windows server?

venksel
Explorer

Hi there,
We have Splunk forwarder deployed on a Windows server and inputs.conf is configured with two log sources.

[default]
host = test_OP_CBE_AUX1

[monitor://C:\ClearPath\logs]
whitelist = [\\]cpe2Pims-\d\d\d\d_\d\d_\d\d\.log$
index = pb
sourcetype = json
recursive = false
disabled = false

[monitor://C:\ClearPath\logs\CatalogUpdater]
whitelist = [\\]UnclassifiedExtractor_splunk\.log
index = pb
sourcetype = json
recursive = false
disabled = false

However, we are seeing logs forwarded to Splunk indexer only from [monitor://C:\ClearPath\logs] and other source [monitor://C:\ClearPath\logs\CatalogUpdater] does not forward the logs.

If set disable to "true" for [monitor://C:\ClearPath\logs] -- we immediately see logs being forwarded from [monitor://C:\ClearPath\logs\CatalogUpdater]

This is not a licensing issue. Any inputs on what's causing this issue will be greatly appreciated.

Cheers,
Pam

1 Solution

anthonymelita
Contributor

This is a bit of a shot in the dark, but have you tried moving the second input stanza above the first one? Splunk plays by it's own set of order of operations, and maybe the recursive=disabled in the first stanza is blocking the second input which exists in a subdirectory.

View solution in original post

0 Karma

ddrillic
Ultra Champion

I'm not crazy about the whitelist way.

What about something like? -

[monitor://C:\ClearPath\logs\cpe2Pims-*.log]
.....

[monitor://C:\ClearPath\logs\CatalogUpdater\UnclassifiedExtractor_splunk.log]
.....

It's simpler...

0 Karma

venksel
Explorer

ddrillic - it's resolved after following the recommendation from Anthony. I appreciate you taking time to reply to my post and your willingness to help is greatly appreciated.

0 Karma

ddrillic
Ultra Champion

Sounds great! recursive = false applies on the entire [monitor://C:\ClearPath\logs]. That's another reason why my suggestion should work and keep it clearer ; -)

0 Karma

venksel
Explorer

anthonymelita - Problem solved!

You are the best and thank you so much for taking time to reply.

Cheers and a happy forth!

0 Karma

anthonymelita
Contributor

This is a bit of a shot in the dark, but have you tried moving the second input stanza above the first one? Splunk plays by it's own set of order of operations, and maybe the recursive=disabled in the first stanza is blocking the second input which exists in a subdirectory.

0 Karma
Got questions? Get answers!

Join the Splunk Community Slack to learn, troubleshoot, and make connections with fellow Splunk practitioners in real time!

Meet up IRL or virtually!

Join Splunk User Groups to connect and learn in-person by region or remotely by topic or industry.

Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Vibe-coding, AI, and Splunkcraft: Highlights from the .conf26 Builder Bar

If you stopped by the Builder Bar at .conf26, thank you! This year, we brought ...

Thanks for the Memories: .conf26 Took Learning to New Heights

Thank you, Splunk Community, for making .conf26 in Denver one for the books. From packed Splunk University ...

Best Practices: Splunk auto adjust pipeline queue

When you enable autoAdjustQueue in Splunk, maxSize should be understood as the queue size Splunk starts with ...