Getting Data In

Trying to parse my Json into a table

dperry
Communicator

this is the format:

{
"epoch": "1485892851.94944",
"id": "3952418",
"name": "WMI Performance Adapter",
"new_attrs": "{\"DisplayName\":\"WMI Performance Adapter\",\"ServiceName\":\"wmiApSrv\",\"enabled\":\"Manual\",\"state\":\"Running\",\"User\":\"localSystem\"}",
"new_scan_id": "513186",
"node_environment_id": "2",
"node_id": "153",
"node_name": "servername",
"node_primary_node_group_id": "68",
"old_attrs": "{\"DisplayName\":\"WMI Performance Adapter\",\"ServiceName\":\"wmiApSrv\",\"enabled\":\"Manual\",\"state\":\"Stopped\",\"User\":\"localSystem\"}",
"old_scan_id": "513150",
"path": "{services,windows}",
"status": "modified",
"type": "services",
"updated_at": "2017-01-31 20:00:51.949442"
}

trying to use the spath

Tags (3)
0 Karma
1 Solution

rsennett_splunk
Splunk Employee
Splunk Employee

I believe this is what you are looking for:
I selected one field from new_attr and old_attr because it is the only one that differs. Otherwise you can't see what's happening.

 index=blah sourcetype=blah 
| spath input=new_attrs 
|rename state AS newState
|spath input=old_attrs
|rename state AS oldState
|table newState oldState

But you would simply rename the ones you wanted. ie rename state as newState, DisplayName AS newDisplay, ServiceName AS Fred

With Splunk... the answer is always "YES!". It just might require more regex than you're prepared for!

View solution in original post

0 Karma

rsennett_splunk
Splunk Employee
Splunk Employee

I believe this is what you are looking for:
I selected one field from new_attr and old_attr because it is the only one that differs. Otherwise you can't see what's happening.

 index=blah sourcetype=blah 
| spath input=new_attrs 
|rename state AS newState
|spath input=old_attrs
|rename state AS oldState
|table newState oldState

But you would simply rename the ones you wanted. ie rename state as newState, DisplayName AS newDisplay, ServiceName AS Fred

With Splunk... the answer is always "YES!". It just might require more regex than you're prepared for!
0 Karma

dperry
Communicator

Thanks Producer! This is along the lines of what I was visioning.

0 Karma

rsennett_splunk
Splunk Employee
Splunk Employee

woohoo! Excellent. 🙂

With Splunk... the answer is always "YES!". It just might require more regex than you're prepared for!
0 Karma
Got questions? Get answers!

Join the Splunk Community Slack to learn, troubleshoot, and make connections with fellow Splunk practitioners in real time!

Meet up IRL or virtually!

Join Splunk User Groups to connect and learn in-person by region or remotely by topic or industry.

Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Agentic SOC Triage: Investigating Splunk ES Notables with MCP Server and a Local LLM

The Problem: Too Many Alerts, Too Little Context Security operations teams running Splunk Enterprise Security ...

All Work and No Play? Not at .conf26! Unwind at These Evening Events

Between hands-on technical sessions, keynote reveals, and diving into live architectures, .conf26 is packed ...

Join the Hackathon at .conf26 and build a No-Code AI agent

Join us for the AI Agent Buildathon, an in-person, three-hour hands-on Hackathon where you’ll use Splunk Agent ...