Getting Data In

Timestamp for multivalue fields that had been split up

jiakslim
Engager

Hey there,

I have a question regarding timestamps for multivalue fields that have been splitted up. Initially, my lines were as such: x =[a, b, c, d, e, f, g]. I trimmed away the square brackets by the side and subsequently had them broken up into single value fields. All entries (a, b, c, d, e, f, g) have the same timestamp. However, the problem is that currently only "a" has a timestamp. Everything else doesn't have a timestamp.

Is there a way to which I can insert the same timestamp for all other entries?

Thanks

0 Karma

jiakslim
Engager

Hey niketnilay - yes absolutely, just _time and x. Thanks for the help, everything above worked. And thanks for the advice, I'll include these information in my future questions.
Thanks a million!

0 Karma

niketn
Legend

@jiakslim, you might have to put in more details of what is the raw event data you are working with and what is the query you have tried with current output and what is not working for us to help you better.

Meanwhile, if you have multi-valued field x and you are interested only in _time and x, you should just try using | mvexpand x as your final pipe. Following is a run anywhere example based on information provided so far.

| makeresults 
| eval x ="[a, b, c, d, e, f, g]"
| eval x=replace(x,"(\[|\])","")
| makemv x delim=","
| mvexpand x
____________________________________________
| makeresults | eval message= "Happy Splunking!!!"
Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Application management with Targeted Application Install for Victoria Experience

  Experience a new era of flexibility in managing your Splunk Cloud Platform apps! With Targeted Application ...

Index This | What goes up and never comes down?

January 2026 Edition  Hayyy Splunk Education Enthusiasts and the Eternally Curious!   We’re back with this ...

Splunkers, Pack Your Bags: Why Cisco Live EMEA is Your Next Big Destination

The Power of Two: Splunk + Cisco at "Ludicrous Scale"   You know Splunk. You know Cisco. But have you seen ...