Getting Data In

Is there a way to disable splunk btool check upon start of a forwarder?

ddrillic
Ultra Champion

Apparently all splunk components run the splunk btool check upon a component restart. Is there a way to disable it especially for the forwarders? We reach quite often situations where internal customers come to up to check whether their forwarders came up fine when restarted and the splunk btool check was invoked and threw some warnings.

Tags (2)
0 Karma
1 Solution

richgalloway
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust

AFAIK, you cannot disable btool at startup nor would I think you'd want to. Btool might find an error in the future.

Your options are to fix the forwarder configs to eliminate warnings (best) or educate your customers.

---
If this reply helps you, Karma would be appreciated.

View solution in original post

ddrillic
Ultra Champion

Our sales engineer said -

-- Nope, it's unskippable. And that’s a good thing; if btool fails, Splunk won't run properly so exiting before starting Splunk is the best course of action.

0 Karma

richgalloway
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust

AFAIK, you cannot disable btool at startup nor would I think you'd want to. Btool might find an error in the future.

Your options are to fix the forwarder configs to eliminate warnings (best) or educate your customers.

---
If this reply helps you, Karma would be appreciated.

ddrillic
Ultra Champion

Makes sense @richgalloway.

0 Karma
Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Automatic Discovery Part 1: What is Automatic Discovery in Splunk Observability Cloud ...

If you’ve ever deployed a new database cluster, spun up a caching layer, or added a load balancer, you know it ...

Real-Time Fraud Detection: How Splunk Dashboards Protect Financial Institutions

Financial fraud isn't slowing down. If anything, it's getting more sophisticated. Account takeovers, credit ...

Splunk + ThousandEyes: Correlate frontend, app, and network data to troubleshoot ...

 Are you tired of troubleshooting delays caused by siloed frontend, application, and network data? We've got a ...