Getting Data In

Is it expected behavior for 6.4.1 universal forwarders to work with 6.3.3 indexers?

daniel333
Builder

All,

We accidentally rolled out dozens of 6.4.1 Universal Forwarders, but we have 6.3.3 indexers. To my surprise, it worked! No errors. Is this expected behavior? It's a lot of effort to downgrade our UFs, so if I am supported in this setting, I'd like to leave it.

0 Karma

_d_
Splunk Employee
Splunk Employee
0 Karma
Got questions? Get answers!

Join the Splunk Community Slack to learn, troubleshoot, and make connections with fellow Splunk practitioners in real time!

Meet up IRL or virtually!

Join Splunk User Groups to connect and learn in-person by region or remotely by topic or industry.

Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Vibe-coding, AI, and Splunkcraft: Highlights from the .conf26 Builder Bar

If you stopped by the Builder Bar at .conf26, thank you! This year, we brought ...

Thanks for the Memories: .conf26 Took Learning to New Heights

Thank you, Splunk Community, for making .conf26 in Denver one for the books. From packed Splunk University ...

Best Practices: Splunk auto adjust pipeline queue

When you enable autoAdjustQueue in Splunk, maxSize should be understood as the queue size Splunk starts with ...