Getting Data In

In what case would there be a switch to Syslog-NG PE?

ansif
Motivator

Do we need Syslog-NG PE?

Currently we are using Syslog-NG OSE. At what case we need to swith to PE?

Tags (2)
0 Karma

GergelyBodnar
Explorer

Hi,

The main differences between syslog-ng PE and OSE:
- Professional support
- Pre-compiled and deeply tested binaries on various platforms
- PE only features like
WEC (Windows Event Collector),
Splunk destination,
Reliable log transport (ALTP),
Tamperproof log storage with logstore

These are the main differences, rest of them can be found on syslog-ng.com

ansif
Motivator

Thanks @GerglyBodnar

Let me ask in this way

What is the challenge of using SyslogNG OSE for Splunk? If in case I just need to have some syslogs written to file and forward using UF.

0 Karma

GergelyBodnar
Explorer

If you don't want to utilize Splunk HEC, only using UF then the OSE version also can be a good choice for you. In that case when you have high traffic you have to take care of the load balancing/scaling towards Splunk by yourself.

0 Karma
Got questions? Get answers!

Join the Splunk Community Slack to learn, troubleshoot, and make connections with fellow Splunk practitioners in real time!

Meet up IRL or virtually!

Join Splunk User Groups to connect and learn in-person by region or remotely by topic or industry.

Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Persistent Queue at TcpOut — One of Splunk's Most Practical Features

Splunk introduced persistent queueing at the tcpout layer as one of the most practical resilience features in ...

Skip the Awkward Silence: Have a .conf-ersation at .conf26

Picture this. You arrive at .conf26 already having your socializing and networking plans mapped out. No ...

Rethinking Zero Trust: From Product Purchases to Logical Control Evidence

Implementing Zero Trust (ZT) across complex environments often falters at the very beginning due to a ...