Deployment Architecture

In a clustered deployment, can you reference the master node by a DNS name instead of an IP?

kdoonan
Explorer

Eg, if you specify the master as master.domain.local? This may be a silly question but will it cause any issues? The idea being that if the master goes down, we can relaunch it and just change the DNS to point to the new server.

Some follow on questions:

If we do this and change the DNS, will the nodes resolve the change automatically?

If there are 2 master servers running, but only 1 of them is being sent data, will it cause any issues? Eg, if we do relaunch the server and then the original one recovers.

Thanks

Tags (2)
1 Solution

martin_mueller
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust

I see no reason not to use a DNS name. http://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/6.1.2/Indexer/Handlemasternodefailure#Ensure_that_the_pe... explicitly mentions using DNS as well.

As for the old master coming back up, your nodes won't notice because you've changed the DNS entry.

View solution in original post

martin_mueller
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust

I see no reason not to use a DNS name. http://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/6.1.2/Indexer/Handlemasternodefailure#Ensure_that_the_pe... explicitly mentions using DNS as well.

As for the old master coming back up, your nodes won't notice because you've changed the DNS entry.

Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Extending Observability Content to Splunk Cloud

Watch Now!   In this Extending Observability Content to Splunk Cloud Tech Talk, you'll see how to leverage ...

More Control Over Your Monitoring Costs with Archived Metrics GA in US-AWS!

What if there was a way you could keep all the metrics data you need while saving on storage costs?This is now ...

New in Observability Cloud - Explicit Bucket Histograms

Splunk introduces native support for histograms as a metric data type within Observability Cloud with Explicit ...