All Apps and Add-ons

Why does the Splunk Add-on for Infoblox not always parse the record_type field correctly?

nrizzi
Engager

In the Splunk Add-on for Infoblox, the record_type field does not always parse correctly--especially instances in which there RRSIG records returned. Here is an instance where the parsing works fine.

 

 

 

Apr 21 08:41:27 xxx.xx.xxx.xx named[10396]: 21-Apr-2021 08:41:27.792 client xx.xxx.xx.xx#60438: UDP: query: self.events.data.microsoft.com IN A response: NOERROR + self.events.data.microsoft.com. 2064 IN CNAME self-events-data.trafficmanager.net.; self-events-data.trafficmanager.net. 6 IN CNAME skypedataprdcolcus14.cloudapp.net.; skypedataprdcolcus14.cloudapp.net. 3 IN A xx.xx.xxx.xxx;

record_type = CNAME record_type = CNAME record_type = A

 

Infoblox App Version is 2.0.0. Thanks!

 

 

However, here is an instance where it does not work, and where it's returning a RRSIG record_type. There is always an extracted timestamp:

 

 

 

Apr 21 08:51:12 xxx.xxx.x.xx named[18234]: 21-Apr-2021 08:51:12.351 client xxx.xxx.xx.xx#36237: UDP: query: data.lseg.com IN A response: NOERROR +EDV data.lseg.com. 300 IN A xxx.xxx.x.xx; data.lseg.com. 300 IN RRSIG A 13 3 300 20210422075112 20210420055112 34505 lseg.com. FR6lVgPJ3AI6aLoo+XCebNkTxORPa+pKk6CbFo0bs4Q/hnvCl3nN5E+9N6JRTUKe22XqOYFtoGBv1/9Q89ldaA==;

record_type = A record_type = RRSIG record_type = 20210422075112

 

 

 

 

 

 

Labels (1)
Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Welcome to the Splunk Community!

(view in My Videos) We're so glad you're here! The Splunk Community is place to connect, learn, give back, and ...

Tech Talk | Elevating Digital Service Excellence: The Synergy of Splunk RUM & APM

Elevating Digital Service Excellence: The Synergy of Real User Monitoring and Application Performance ...

Adoption of RUM and APM at Splunk

    Unleash the power of Splunk Observability   Watch Now In this can't miss Tech Talk! The Splunk Growth ...