All Apps and Add-ons

Website Monitoring: What are the default units for the website search? milliseconds?

New Member

Our web sites seem to alert no matter what, even though it is under the 1000 ms in the macro. Is it alerting based on this search which was cloned from the default website monitoring search? If so, what needs to be changed? It appears that this statement may be at 1-3 milliseconds.

eval time_exceeded=if(response_time>`response_time_threshold`,1,0) | eval avg_time_exceeded=if(avg_response_time>`response_time_threshold`,1,0) | eval response_time=round(response_time, 3)." ms" | eval average=round(avg_response_time, 2)." ms" | eval maximum=round(max_response_time, 2)." ms" | eval range=round(min, 0)." - ".round(min+range, 0)." ms" | table title url response_code last_checked time_exceeded response_time avg_time_exceeded average range sparkline_response_time  | `timesince(last_checked,last_checked)`
0 Karma


The search that you are using doesn't filter out results that are within the threshold. For alerting, you want a search that only returns results when a problem is identified (zero results when there are zero problems).

The app comes with a search named "website_performance_problems" which is intended for this type of alerting. I recommend using or cloning that one since it filters results unless they exceed the timeout or indicate a failure (like an problematic return code).

0 Karma
Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Unify Your SecOps with Splunk Mission Control

In today’s post, I'm excited to share some recent Splunk Mission Control innovations. With Splunk Mission ...

Data Preparation Made Easy: SPL2 for Edge Processor

By now, you may have heard the exciting news that Edge Processor, the easy-to-use Splunk data preparation tool ...

Introducing Edge Processor: Next Gen Data Transformation

We get it - not only can it take a lot of time, money and resources to get data into Splunk, but it also takes ...