Alerting

Splunk throwing HTTP 401 not authorized error when called from Java SDK

raghav130593
Explorer

I have multiple GetSplunk processors running using a Cron driven scheduling strategy. The Cron expression looks like '0 30 13 * * ?'. They all successfully execute the query the first time it's run. But, the next day it errors out with a 401 error from Splunk. The error from nifi-app.log is as below. The Cron scheduler in NiFi is a QuartzScheduler.
WARN [Timer-Driven Process Thread-7] o.a.n.c.t.ContinuallyRunProcessorTask Administratively Yielding GetSplunk[id=01581009-026c-114b-5e2e-401ebea6427d] due to uncaught Exception: com.splunk.HttpException: HTTP 401 -- call not properly authenticated
2016-12-21 13:30:00,300 WARN [Timer-Driven Process Thread-2] o.a.n.c.t.ContinuallyRunProcessorTask
com.splunk.HttpException: HTTP 401 -- call not properly authenticated
at com.splunk.HttpException.create(HttpException.java:84) ~[na:na]
at com.splunk.HttpService.send(HttpService.java:452) ~[na:na]
at com.splunk.Service.send(Service.java:1293) ~[na:na]
at com.splunk.HttpService.get(HttpService.java:165) ~[na:na]
at com.splunk.Service.export(Service.java:222) ~[na:na]
at com.splunk.Service.export(Service.java:237) ~[na:na]
at org.apache.nifi.processors.splunk.GetSplunk.onTrigger(GetSplunk.java:461) ~[na:na]
at org.apache.nifi.processor.AbstractProcessor.onTrigger(AbstractProcessor.java:27) ~[nifi-api-1.1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar:1.1.0-SNAPSHOT]
at org.apache.nifi.controller.StandardProcessorNode.onTrigger(StandardProcessorNode.java:1064) ~[nifi-framework-core-1.1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar:1.1.0-SNAPSHOT]
at org.apache.nifi.controller.tasks.ContinuallyRunProcessorTask.call(ContinuallyRunProcessorTask.java:136) [nifi-framework-core-1.1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar:1.1.0-SNAPSHOT]
at org.apache.nifi.controller.tasks.ContinuallyRunProcessorTask.call(ContinuallyRunProcessorTask.java:47) [nifi-framework-core-1.1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar:1.1.0-SNAPSHOT]
at org.apache.nifi.controller.scheduling.QuartzSchedulingAgent$2.run(QuartzSchedulingAgent.java:165) [nifi-framework-core-1.1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar:1.1.0-SNAPSHOT]
at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511) [na:1.8.0_101]
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266) [na:1.8.0_101]
at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:180) [na:1.8.0_101]
at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:293) [na:1.8.0_101]
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142) [na:1.8.0_101]
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617) [na:1.8.0_101]
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745) [na:1.8.0_101]

The GetSplunk processor makes use of Java SDK for Splunk. My earliest time is '-24h' and latest time is 'now'. I am hitting splunkd with port 8089.
Help appreciated.

0 Karma
1 Solution

raghav130593
Explorer

I found the issue. It was a lazy authorization issue within Apache Nifi's GetSplunk processor and not really Splunk's issue. The session that getting created used to expire and a new session wasn't getting created consecutive times within the cron scheduler.

View solution in original post

0 Karma

raghav130593
Explorer

I found the issue. It was a lazy authorization issue within Apache Nifi's GetSplunk processor and not really Splunk's issue. The session that getting created used to expire and a new session wasn't getting created consecutive times within the cron scheduler.

0 Karma

jantreassian
New Member

@raghav130593, which version of the Splunk SDK are you using?
I'm having this issue as well with version 1.3.2.

0 Karma
Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Index This | What’s a riddle wrapped in an enigma?

September 2025 Edition Hayyy Splunk Education Enthusiasts and the Eternally Curious!  We’re back with this ...

BORE at .conf25

Boss Of Regular Expression (BORE) was an interactive session run again this year at .conf25 by the brilliant ...

OpenTelemetry for Legacy Apps? Yes, You Can!

This article is a follow-up to my previous article posted on the OpenTelemetry Blog, "Your Critical Legacy App ...