Splunk Search

What is the difference between min() max() and earliest() latest() for _time manipulations?

edefIo1937
Engager

If i only want to use the field "_time" of a log to get first and latest occurrence of an event, which commands should i use and why ? 

ex:
...
| stats earliest(_time) as firsttime latest(_time) as lasttime 

...

or
... 

| stats min(_time) as firsttime max(_time) as lasttime

...

 

Is there a case where i could get differents results ?

Labels (2)

jordan_art
Engager

what does Splunk recommend ?

 
0 Karma

gcusello
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust

Hi @jordan_art,

there isn't a best practice, you can use both of them with the same results.

Ciao.

Giuseppe

0 Karma

gcusello
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust

Hi @edefIo1937,

_time is a timestamp in epochtime format, in other words a progressive number, so it's the same thing.

I usually use earliest and latest.

Ciao.

Giuseppe

0 Karma

yuanliu
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust

Whereas there is no numeric difference, I am also curious as to which one is faster.  I usually go with min/max with the following reasoning:

  • min/max are purely mathematical after all values become available.
  • earliest(_time)/latest(_time), on the other hand, require two operations, one to compare time stamps on events, one to return value of _time.

The second argument, of course, is flawed.  It should depend on implementation of index and search.  Any Splunk insider to shed light on this?

Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

[Puzzles] Solve, Learn, Repeat: Reprocessing XML into Fixed-Length Events

This challenge was first posted on Slack #puzzles channelFor a previous puzzle, I needed a set of fixed-length ...

Data Management Digest – December 2025

Welcome to the December edition of Data Management Digest! As we continue our journey of data innovation, the ...

Index This | What is broken 80% of the time by February?

December 2025 Edition   Hayyy Splunk Education Enthusiasts and the Eternally Curious!    We’re back with this ...