Splunk Search

Summary Index & sistats

sranga
Path Finder

Hi

I am seeing some weirdness with one of the saved-searches that we have. One of these searches is of the form:

... | bucket span=1h _time | sistats median(field1), avg(field1) by _time,field2,field3  

When I ran this query for the last 60 minutes, it generated a lot of results (close to 295K). When I ran the same query using the stats command instead, I got close to 160 results.

I am not sure why this is happening. We are using version 4.0.10. Thanks for your help.

Ranga

0 Karma
1 Solution

gkanapathy
Splunk Employee
Splunk Employee

field1 is probably a numeric field with many distinct values. If you use sistats to calculate a median or other percentiles on such a field (or a distinct_count), you will wind up with a very large summary index, at least one entry for every distinct value. (In your case you probably have about 1600 distinct values, each accounting for about 160 entries.) This is correct, and is the only way to summarize a median in such a way that an aggregated median can be reduced from this.

If you don't want this, then you should first "bucket" field1. this will reduce the size of your summary, at some slight cost in the accuracy of aggregated medians.

View solution in original post

0 Karma

gkanapathy
Splunk Employee
Splunk Employee

field1 is probably a numeric field with many distinct values. If you use sistats to calculate a median or other percentiles on such a field (or a distinct_count), you will wind up with a very large summary index, at least one entry for every distinct value. (In your case you probably have about 1600 distinct values, each accounting for about 160 entries.) This is correct, and is the only way to summarize a median in such a way that an aggregated median can be reduced from this.

If you don't want this, then you should first "bucket" field1. this will reduce the size of your summary, at some slight cost in the accuracy of aggregated medians.

0 Karma

gkanapathy
Splunk Employee
Splunk Employee

It occurs to me that you can use the function makecontinuous instead of bucket, and that should give you better results.

0 Karma

gkanapathy
Splunk Employee
Splunk Employee

that's because bucket creates a range for non-time values, not a single value. you need to eval it apart into two numbers and decide what you want to represent the values within the range.

0 Karma

sranga
Path Finder

I tried adding bucket bins=50 field1 before the sistats command, but that results in the Median & Average values not getting calculated.

0 Karma
Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

How to Monitor Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE)

We’ve looked at how to integrate Kubernetes environments with Splunk Observability Cloud, but what about ...

Index This | How can you make 45 using only 4?

October 2024 Edition Hayyy Splunk Education Enthusiasts and the Eternally Curious!  We’re back with this ...

Splunk Education Goes to Washington | Splunk GovSummit 2024

If you’re in the Washington, D.C. area, this is your opportunity to take your career and Splunk skills to the ...