Splunk Search

Is there a way to get 2 nonstream Searches to run in parallel in the same SPL?

robertlynch2020
Influencer

Hi - Is there a way to get 2 nonstream Searches to run in parallel in the same SPL?

I am using "appendcols", but I think one is waiting for the other to finish.

I can't use multisearch as I don't have stream commands.
The issue is displaying the license used by Splunk and I want to run 2 SPL in parallel. However, it's very slow to run if I run 2 in sequence. Thanks in advance for any help

 

index=_internal 
    [ `set_local_host`] source=*license_usage.log* type="Usage" 
| eval h=if(len(h)=0 OR isnull(h),"(SQUASHED)",h) 
| eval s=if(len(s)=0 OR isnull(s),"(SQUASHED)",s) 
| eval idx=if(len(idx)=0 OR isnull(idx),"(UNKNOWN)",idx) 
| bin _time span=1d 
| stats sum(b) as b by _time, pool, s, st, h, idx 
| search pool = "*" 
| search idx != "mlc_log_drop" 
| timechart span=1d sum(b) AS Live_Data fixedrange=false 
| fields - _timediff 
| foreach * 
    [ eval <<FIELD>>=round('<<FIELD>>'/1024/1024/1024, 3)] 
| appendcols 
    [ search index=_internal 
        [ `set_local_host`] source=*license_usage.log* type="Usage" 
    | eval h=if(len(h)=0 OR isnull(h),"(SQUASHED)",h) 
    | eval s=if(len(s)=0 OR isnull(s),"(SQUASHED)",s) 
    | eval idx=if(len(idx)=0 OR isnull(idx),"(UNKNOWN)",idx) 
    | bin _time span=1d 
    | stats sum(b) as b by _time, pool, s, st, h, idx 
    | search pool = "*" 
    | search idx = "mlc_log_drop" 
    | timechart span=1d sum(b) AS Log_Drop_Data fixedrange=false 
    | fields - _timediff 
    | foreach * 
        [ eval <<FIELD>>=round('<<FIELD>>'/1024/1024/1024, 3)]] 

 

 

 

Labels (1)
0 Karma
1 Solution

PickleRick
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust

You're asking a wrong question.

Your both searches start with the same base search so either you should be able to do all in one go or your searches produce differently aggregated results so it doesn't make sense to combine them with appendcols.

View solution in original post

PickleRick
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust

You're asking a wrong question.

Your both searches start with the same base search so either you should be able to do all in one go or your searches produce differently aggregated results so it doesn't make sense to combine them with appendcols.

robertlynch2020
Influencer

HI

I agree that is correct and this was an example of 2 SPLs I had, but I had other issues else where the SPLs were different.

The UNION command was able to help me out in this case.

Thanks

Robert

0 Karma
Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Index This | What are the 12 Days of Splunk-mas?

December 2024 Edition Hayyy Splunk Education Enthusiasts and the Eternally Curious!  We’re back with another ...

Get Inspired! We’ve Got Validation that Your Hard Work is Paying Off

We love our Splunk Community and want you to feel inspired by all your hard work! Eric Fusilero, our VP of ...

What's New in Splunk Enterprise 9.4: Features to Power Your Digital Resilience

Hey Splunky People! We are excited to share the latest updates in Splunk Enterprise 9.4. In this release we ...