Hi,
I'm building a report to count the numbers of events per AWS accounts vs Regions with stats and xyseries. It works well but I would like to filter to have only the 5 rare regions (fewer events). When I'm adding the rare, it just doesn’t work.
index=aws sourcetype="aws:cloudtrail"
| rare limit=5 awsRegion
| stats count by awsRegion, account
| xyseries account awsRegion count
Any ideas?
Thanks
The reason it doesn't work is that rare will only leave the regions without the corresponding accounts
Assuming you want the counts for all the accounts in the 5 lowest total regions, you could do something like this:
index=aws sourcetype="aws:cloudtrail"
| stats count by awsRegion account
| eventstats sum(count) as total by awsRegion
| sort 0 total awsRegion
| streamstats dc(awsRegion) as rank
| where rank < 6
| xyseries account awsRegion count
The reason it doesn't work is that rare will only leave the regions without the corresponding accounts
Assuming you want the counts for all the accounts in the 5 lowest total regions, you could do something like this:
index=aws sourcetype="aws:cloudtrail"
| stats count by awsRegion account
| eventstats sum(count) as total by awsRegion
| sort 0 total awsRegion
| streamstats dc(awsRegion) as rank
| where rank < 6
| xyseries account awsRegion count
Thanks @ITWhisperer , Great look like it is working! Interesting new approach that I will explore more.
I also add a total to sort it not sure it is the most efficient way but it did work.
index=aws sourcetype="aws:cloudtrail"
| stats count by awsRegion account
| eventstats sum(count) as total by awsRegion
| sort 0 total awsRegion
| streamstats dc(awsRegion) as rank
| where rank < 5
| xyseries account awsRegion count
| addtotals fieldname=TotalEvents
| eval TotalEvents=TotalEvents-account
| sort TotalEvents
Something like this should work, I don't have any cloudtrail data on hand at the moment.
index=aws sourcetype="aws:cloudtrail"
| chart count by account awsRegion limit=0
| addtotals
| sort limit=5 Total
Thanks @chaker Unfortunately, your suggestion that still provide another way to express a table but only take the top 5 in alphabetic not in term of less or most use