- Mark as New
- Bookmark Message
- Subscribe to Message
- Mute Message
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi Splunkers
I'm looking for a way to append a column with an ID based on the value of another field.
Base search gives this
index=transactionlog sourcetype=transaction earliest=-1h@h latest=@h
| table _time Item Count
datetime=2025-03-10T08:59:59 Item=Apple Count=8
datetime=2025-03-10T08:59:45 Item=Banana Count=2
datetime=2025-03-10T08:58:39 Item=Apple Count=5
datetime=2025-03-10T08:58:25 Item=Coconut Count=1
datetime=2025-03-10T08:57:36 Item=Banana Count=2
_time | Item | Count |
... | Apple | 8 |
... | Banana | 2 |
... | Apple | 5 |
... | Coconut | 1 |
... | Banana | 2 |
I'd like something that gives this
_time | Item | Count | ID |
... | Apple | 8 | 1 |
... | Banana | 2 | 2 |
... | Apple | 5 | 1 |
... | Coconut | 1 | 3 |
... | Banana | 2 | 2 |
The ID is local, based only on the results. Each unique item is numbered.
I've tried streamstats count but this doesn't give the desired results.
Thanks all
- Mark as New
- Bookmark Message
- Subscribe to Message
- Mute Message
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content

- Mark as New
- Bookmark Message
- Subscribe to Message
- Mute Message
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content

| streamstats dc(Item) as ID
| eventstats min(ID) as ID by Item
- Mark as New
- Bookmark Message
- Subscribe to Message
- Mute Message
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
- Mark as New
- Bookmark Message
- Subscribe to Message
- Mute Message
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content


Hi @dataisbeautiful ,
good for you, see next time!
Ciao and happy splunking
Giuseppe
P.S.: Karma Points are appreciated by all the contributors 😉
- Mark as New
- Bookmark Message
- Subscribe to Message
- Mute Message
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
@gcuselloI've updated my post with the base search and raw data
@meetmshahthe ID is not in the raw data, it is something I am adding only at time of search
I'm not interested in maintaining an ID between times, it's going to be used in a visualisation on a deashboard.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark Message
- Subscribe to Message
- Mute Message
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content


Hi @dataisbeautiful ,
in other words, you need to add a progressive number to your results, is it correct?
if this is your requirement, please try this:
index=transactionlog sourcetype=transaction earliest=-1h@h latest=@h
| eval counter=1
| accum counter AS ID
| fields - counter
| table _time Item Count ID
Ciao,
Giuseppe
- Mark as New
- Bookmark Message
- Subscribe to Message
- Mute Message
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi @gcusello
Thanks for your suggestion, I've run this
index=transactionlog sourcetype=transaction earliest=-1h@h latest=@h
| eval counter=1
| accum counter AS ID
| fields - counter
| table _time Item Count ID
It gives the output
_time | Item | Count | ID |
... | Apple | 8 | 1 |
... | Banana | 2 | 2 |
... | Apple | 5 | 3 |
... | Coconut | 1 | 4 |
... | Banana | 2 | 5 |
This isn't what I'm after as Apple doesn't have a single ID now.
I'd like a single ID per unique value of Item, not a row counter ID. Hope that makes sence.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark Message
- Subscribe to Message
- Mute Message
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content


Hi @dataisbeautiful ,
ok, please try this:
index=transactionlog sourcetype=transaction earliest=-1h@h latest=@h
| join type=left Item
[ search index=transactionlog sourcetype=transaction earliest=-1h@h latest=@h
| stats count BY Item
| eval counter=1
| accum counter AS ID
| table Item ID ]
| table _time Item Count ID
Ciao.
Giuseppe
- Mark as New
- Bookmark Message
- Subscribe to Message
- Mute Message
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content


Hi @dataisbeautiful ,
could you share your search and a sample of your data (both using "Add/Edit Code Sample" button not a screenshot)?
Ciao.
Giuseppe
- Mark as New
- Bookmark Message
- Subscribe to Message
- Mute Message
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hello @dataisbeautiful, You can just add the other field name afte the by clause?
can you give the current search which you are using and confirm if the ID field that you want to add is in the events itself?
