Splunk ITSI

ITSi Recurring Service Import Job- Is this a bug?

taparshi1
Observer

Hello Spelunkers

Did anyone tried the approach to import services using recurring import job . 

For example , using CSV as definition for ,  services - dependent services - entities - service template , then import the same on a schedule , to make sure no unwanted changes affect any service design . 

I am facing issue while doing the same , "replace" update type not working , its always doing a "upsert" , which means if I remove any entity from CSV its not getting removed from the entity rule ..

is this is a bug or Splunk don't have the conflict resolution applied for "Service import job" , only for "entity import" ...  let me know your views ......

Labels (1)
0 Karma

srauhala_splunk
Splunk Employee
Splunk Employee

Do you specialise exactly which entities you want in the entity filter? and then use scheduled service imports to change that? I have not tried that. 

One option as a walkaround could be to have more generic entity filter and instead use info fields of entities to pass the filter or not. I.e. let a scheduled import/update of the entities define whether they qualify for being used by the services. 

/Seb  

0 Karma

taparshi1
Observer

Hello @srauhala_splunk 

Thanks for your reply.

Correct, we are trying to use lookup as source for service design, which has all the details (service name//dependent services//entities//service template) .
Now, the problem is, the import job is not "replacing." the entity, which is removed from lookup, instead its always "updating" the event rule. 

Example -- A, B, C in the entity list. --> Added D in the lookup and removed C from the lookup --> now we can see, A, B, C, D, in the event rule, which should not be the case. 

We have also changed the ..import.type = replace from advance edit, but still issue remains the same. 

0 Karma

srauhala_splunk
Splunk Employee
Splunk Employee

Okey @taparshi1

Looking around in the documentation and in the UI this use case does not seem to be supported. Please add it to https://ideas.splunk.com.  

However in you situation I would solve it slightly different. You can manage information fields of the entities to achieve the same result. 

Service Template: my_database_service_template For example create a service using a service template where you defined a set of entity filters. At the time you run the service import job you will set these filters to match a value from your CSV. 

Simple Example: 

Service name: my_oracle_db 

Service Template: my_oracle_db_service_template 

Entity filter: my_entity_type:oracle_db, my_qualifier_info_field:true 

With the above setup you can instead manipulate the info field "my_qualifier_info_field" of the entities to activate / deactivate entities from your service. The qualifier for true/false can in turn be managed in a lookup, that in turn are used doing scheduled updates / imports of entities. This decouples the service from fixed list of entity host names and makes it adaptable to entities available that passes the entity filter. 

  /Seb 

0 Karma
Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

New Case Study Shows the Value of Partnering with Splunk Academic Alliance

The University of Nevada, Las Vegas (UNLV) is another premier research institution helping to shape the next ...

How to Monitor Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE)

We’ve looked at how to integrate Kubernetes environments with Splunk Observability Cloud, but what about ...

Index This | How can you make 45 using only 4?

October 2024 Edition Hayyy Splunk Education Enthusiasts and the Eternally Curious!  We’re back with this ...