Splunk Enterprise Security

Auditing Datamodels

zekiramhi
Path Finder

Hello,

Is there a way to validate the fields used in the datamodel by how compliant they are with the current setup?
I am trying to validate and fix data models to receive optimum results in the Splunk ES.

Any tips regarding the issue will be appreciated,
Thanks

0 Karma
1 Solution

lakshman239
Influencer

Would this help? https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/ES/5.2.2/Admin/Dashboardrequirements

Also, for e.g. You can use | from datamodel "Authentication.Authentication" | fieldsummary for Authentication datamodel to check if all the datamodel fields are mapped and check the valued to see if they are related to your datasource.

View solution in original post

lakshman239
Influencer

if you are happy with the answers provided and/or your issue resolved, can you pls accept the response to close tracking on this?

0 Karma

zekiramhi
Path Finder

Sure, Sorry im new to Splunk Answers.

0 Karma

skalliger
Motivator

There is also the function fieldsummary.

0 Karma

lakshman239
Influencer

Would this help? https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/ES/5.2.2/Admin/Dashboardrequirements

Also, for e.g. You can use | from datamodel "Authentication.Authentication" | fieldsummary for Authentication datamodel to check if all the datamodel fields are mapped and check the valued to see if they are related to your datasource.

zekiramhi
Path Finder

Fantastic, Exactly what I needed. Thanks!

0 Karma

adonio
Ultra Champion
Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Enterprise Security Content Update (ESCU) | New Releases

In December, the Splunk Threat Research Team had 1 release of new security content via the Enterprise Security ...

Why am I not seeing the finding in Splunk Enterprise Security Analyst Queue?

(This is the first of a series of 2 blogs). Splunk Enterprise Security is a fantastic tool that offers robust ...

Index This | What are the 12 Days of Splunk-mas?

December 2024 Edition Hayyy Splunk Education Enthusiasts and the Eternally Curious!  We’re back with another ...