Splunk Dev

Custom search command (v2/chunked): A lot of time passes between prepare() and generate()

spunk_enthusias
Path Finder

I am building a GeneratingCommand and even in the most basic version a lot of time passes between the invocation of prepare() (called after about 50ms after start) and generate() (called about 170ms after start).

We plan to invoke this command frequently, so this gap matters. How can I reduce it?

0 Karma

spunk_enthusias
Path Finder

Now here's an interesting tidbit: Where a bare-bones Python script using Splunklib takes 170ms to dispatch.evaluate, a dbxquery from DB Connect takes 80ms for a whole query! And that's also with a chunked python3 search command.

So what's different? It doesn't use splunklib! Or at least not the Python version. The Python script acting as the bridge simply forwards the search protocol messages to a TCP server which likely uses the Java implementation.

I've said before that splunklib could use some attention - case in point.

0 Karma
Career Survey
First 500 qualified respondents will receive a $20 gift card! Tell us about your professional Splunk journey.

Can’t make it to .conf25? Join us online!

Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Can’t Make It to Boston? Stream .conf25 and Learn with Haya Husain

Boston may be buzzing this September with Splunk University and .conf25, but you don’t have to pack a bag to ...

Splunk Lantern’s Guide to The Most Popular .conf25 Sessions

Splunk Lantern is a Splunk customer success center that provides advice from Splunk experts on valuable data ...

Unlock What’s Next: The Splunk Cloud Platform at .conf25

In just a few days, Boston will be buzzing as the Splunk team and thousands of community members come together ...