On one of my non-production search deployers, when I issue an apply shcluster-bundle, I am not being challenged for username/password after the first successful authentication following a splunk restart.
I've compared the server.conf->shclustering between two deployers, one that seems to challenge me pretty much ever time (preferred) and this other one that never challenges me ... the shclustering configs are identical.
Can anyone point me to where this can be configured? I do wish to be challenged routinely because we typically perform these operations across a team of Splunk admins using their own credentials. The current situation implies that Splunk is seemingly caching the credentials indefinitely.
note: I realize I can use -auth username:password ... but obviously, the cleartext password then gets written into the shell history which I do not want.
Hi Pkeller,
When you run those any admin commands, for any other purpose you inputted the admin credentials on performing other commands on that VM/server, the same credentials it tries to use for the following commands. For example if you have the Deployment server/Deployer on the same VM/server, you ran reload deploy-server and inputed the credentials, and you ran apply shcluster-bundle followed by reload, it doesn't ask you for the credentials and may be this is what is happening.
Hi Pkeller,
When you run those any admin commands, for any other purpose you inputted the admin credentials on performing other commands on that VM/server, the same credentials it tries to use for the following commands. For example if you have the Deployment server/Deployer on the same VM/server, you ran reload deploy-server and inputed the credentials, and you ran apply shcluster-bundle followed by reload, it doesn't ask you for the credentials and may be this is what is happening.
My question is more around the challenging of those credentials. Our preference would be that we are challenged for credentials every time. And from your comments, it appears that it's not available. Thanks for replying. 🙂