Monitoring Splunk

When troubleshooting data ingestion on search heads, which SH is best to use ?

damode1
Path Finder

As the title says, when troubleshooting data ingestion on search heads e.g. running an SPL to check if certain data is landing to that index or searching through an addon like aws to check its diagnostic logs on the HF.

For tests like these, which search heads are best to use, monitoring console or a regular search head or an SHC ?

Tags (1)
0 Karma

gcusello
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust

Hi @damode1,

when you speak of troubleshooting data ingestion, probably you're meaning of serching on Splunk.

In this case you can use every Search Head that can access data, there isn't any prefereable one.

If instead you are using SHs for inputs, it isn't correct, it's always better to have different roles (usually Universal or Heavy Forwarders) to ingest data.

The only exception is Splunk Cloud, where in the Search Heads you can do almost everything.

Ciao.,

Giuseppe

0 Karma
Career Survey
First 500 qualified respondents will receive a $20 gift card! Tell us about your professional Splunk journey.

Can’t make it to .conf25? Join us online!

Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Can’t Make It to Boston? Stream .conf25 and Learn with Haya Husain

Boston may be buzzing this September with Splunk University and .conf25, but you don’t have to pack a bag to ...

Splunk Lantern’s Guide to The Most Popular .conf25 Sessions

Splunk Lantern is a Splunk customer success center that provides advice from Splunk experts on valuable data ...

Unlock What’s Next: The Splunk Cloud Platform at .conf25

In just a few days, Boston will be buzzing as the Splunk team and thousands of community members come together ...