Monitoring Splunk

What are the performance impact or other ramifications of deleting events?

the_wolverine
Champion

We are trying out a method of deleting events from the index. It looks like a metadb rebuild takes place every time we do this so would like to know what the performance implications are, if any:

10-09-2012 16:01:13.287 +0000 INFO  databasePartitionPolicy - Detected a deletion, rebuilding metadata in directory '/var/lib/splunkdb/main' 10-09-2012 16:01:38.986 +0000 INFO  databasePartitionPolicy - rebuildMetadata called: full=true path=/var/lib/splunkdb/main reason= delete_fixup 10-09-2012 16:02:05.529
+0000 INFO  databasePartitionPolicy - Detected a deletion, rebuilding metadata in directory '/var/lib/splunkdb/main' 10-09-2012 16:02:30.585 +0000 INFO  databasePartitionPolicy - rebuildMetadata called: full=true path=/var/lib/splunkdb/main reason= delete_fixup 10-09-2012 16:02:56.595
+0000 INFO  databasePartitionPolicy - Detected a deletion, rebuilding metadata in directory '/var/lib/splunkdb/main' 10-09-2012 16:03:23.114 +0000 INFO  databasePartitionPolicy - rebuildMetadata called: full=true path=/var/lib/splunkdb/main reason= delete_fixup 10-09-2012 16:03:48.600
+0000 INFO  databasePartitionPolicy - Detected a deletion, rebuilding metadata in directory '/var/lib/splunkdb/main' 10-09-2012 16:04:14.583 +0000 INFO  databasePartitionPolicy - rebuildMetadata called: full=true path=/var/lib/splunkdb/main reason= delete_fixup 10-09-2012 16:04:40.996
+0000 INFO  databasePartitionPolicy - Detected a deletion, rebuilding metadata in directory '/var/lib/splunkdb/main' 10-09-2012 16:05:06.330 +0000 INFO  databasePartitionPolicy - rebuildMetadata called: full=true path=/var/lib/splunkdb/main reason= delete_fixup 10-09-2012 16:05:32.331
+0000 INFO  databasePartitionPolicy - Detected a deletion, rebuilding metadata in directory '/var/lib/splunkdb/main'
Tags (2)
0 Karma
1 Solution

the_wolverine
Champion

From experience, it appears that DELETE is relatively expensive. When performing DELETE against many events (more than 10k), if done repeatedly in succession, for example, in the case of scheduled search that finds and "DELETE"s, bad things can happen if your system is undersized so watch it carefully. No idea what happens in a properly sized implementation but maybe Splunk can answer.

View solution in original post

0 Karma

the_wolverine
Champion

From experience, it appears that DELETE is relatively expensive. When performing DELETE against many events (more than 10k), if done repeatedly in succession, for example, in the case of scheduled search that finds and "DELETE"s, bad things can happen if your system is undersized so watch it carefully. No idea what happens in a properly sized implementation but maybe Splunk can answer.

0 Karma
Career Survey
First 500 qualified respondents will receive a $20 gift card! Tell us about your professional Splunk journey.

Can’t make it to .conf25? Join us online!

Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Can’t Make It to Boston? Stream .conf25 and Learn with Haya Husain

Boston may be buzzing this September with Splunk University and .conf25, but you don’t have to pack a bag to ...

Splunk Lantern’s Guide to The Most Popular .conf25 Sessions

Splunk Lantern is a Splunk customer success center that provides advice from Splunk experts on valuable data ...

Unlock What’s Next: The Splunk Cloud Platform at .conf25

In just a few days, Boston will be buzzing as the Splunk team and thousands of community members come together ...